Main Article Content
Abstract
The level crossing at Citayam Station is located on the Bogor electric train (KRL) line which is strategically located, where around the area there are markets and housing that are currently developing. The high activity in the level crossing area has had an impact on increasing mobilization and economic activities of the surrounding community. Several other supporting mobilizations aside from electric trains (KRL) there are modes of transportation such as public transportation/microbuses, online motorcycle taxis, and base motorcycle taxis. Apart from that, there are street vendors who spread along the road around Citayam Station and pedestrians passing by who want to go to locations around the station. It is this large number of community activities that makes the conditions around the crossing area on the same level as Citayam Station crowded and traffic jams often occur, thus affecting the level of road service. Therefore, a government policy is needed to handle level crossings to eliminate congestion. One of the policies that can be taken by the Government is closing level crossings or building underpasses. By carrying out a road inventory, namely by knowing the geometric conditions of the road and the condition of land use around the road section, the capacity of the road can be calculated. The indicators seen are road width, median width, side obstacle conditions, road shoulder width and road type. In addition to calculating road capacity, it is necessary to process data related to road volume and degree of saturation. So that we get a correlation between these three things and the congestion that occurs. By using multiple linear regression analysis techniques, it can be seen the correlation between the correlation of road capacity, road volume, and degree of saturation (variable x) with congestion that occurs (variable y). So that decisions can be taken regarding government policies to deal with the problem of level crossings.
Keywords
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
- . (2009), Undang-undang No. 22 Tahun 2009 Tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan. Jakarta.
- . . (2017). Undang-undang Nomor 23 Tentang Perkeretaapian. Jakarta
- . . (2011) Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 32 Tahun 2011 Tentang Manajemen Rekayasa, Analisa Dampak, serta Manajemen Kebutuhan Lalu lintas.
- . . (2015) Peraturan Menteri (PM) Nomor 75 Tahun 2015 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Analisis Dampak Lalu lintas.
- . . (2015) Peraturan Menteri (PM) Nomor 96 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Manajemen Lalu Lintas.
- . . (2014). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 13 Tentang Rambu Lalu Lintas.
- . . (2014). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 49 Tentang Pemberi Isyarat Lalu lintas.
- Hydén, C. (1987). The Development of A Method For Traffic Safety Evaluation:
- The Swedish Traffic Conflicts Technique. Swedia: Lund University.
- Stover dan Koepke. (1998). Transportation and Development. New Jersey: Prentice Hal.
- Warpani, S. (1993), Rekayasa Lalu Lintas. Jakarta: Barata Karya Aksara.
- Abbas, Salim. 2000. Manajemen Transportasi. Cetakan Pertama. Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia
- Djoko Setijowarno, R. B. Frazila, 2001, Pengantar Sistem Transportasi, Semarang: Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata
- Miro, F. 2005. Perencanaan Transportasi untuk Mahasiswa, Perencana, dan Praktisi. Jakarta: Erlangga.
- Nasution, Arman Hakim. 2008. Perencanaan dan Pengendalian Produksi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu
- Ofyar, Tamin Z. (2008). Perencanaan, pemodelan, dan rekayasa transportasi: Teori contoh soal, dan aplikasi. Bandung: ITB
- Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum. (2012). Panduan Teknis 1 Rekayasa Keselamatan Jalan. Jakarta: Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum.
- Khisty.C.J, Kent L.B. (2005). Dasar-dasar Rekayasa Transportasi Jilid 1.Jakarta: Erlangga
- Black, Jhon. (1993). Traffic ImpactAssesment. Jakarta: Erlangga
- Lawalata, G.M. (2010). Studi Konflik lalu Lintas (Studi Kasus Satu Simpang 3 Di Kota Bandung) (Traffic Conflict Study As Evaluation Tools Of Traffic Management:Case Study At One T-Intersection in Bandung). Bandung. Pusat Litbang Jalan dan Jembatan.
- Muis,Z.A dan Agung, M. Perbandingan Kinerja Simpang Berdasarkan program Kaji dan Sidra (Stufi Kasus : Simpang Setia Budi – DR.Mansyur dan DR.Mansyur – Jamin Ginting). Medan. Universitas Sumatera Utara.
- Prima Juanita Romadhona, Shafira Artistika. (2020). Pengaruh Penutupan Perlintasan Sebidang Kereta Api Di Jalan H.O.S. Cokroaminoto, Yogyakarta. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil (Jrs-Unand). 16 (2) 119-131
- https://www.peta-kota.blogspot.c
References
. (2009), Undang-undang No. 22 Tahun 2009 Tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan. Jakarta.
. . (2017). Undang-undang Nomor 23 Tentang Perkeretaapian. Jakarta
. . (2011) Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 32 Tahun 2011 Tentang Manajemen Rekayasa, Analisa Dampak, serta Manajemen Kebutuhan Lalu lintas.
. . (2015) Peraturan Menteri (PM) Nomor 75 Tahun 2015 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Analisis Dampak Lalu lintas.
. . (2015) Peraturan Menteri (PM) Nomor 96 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Manajemen Lalu Lintas.
. . (2014). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 13 Tentang Rambu Lalu Lintas.
. . (2014). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 49 Tentang Pemberi Isyarat Lalu lintas.
Hydén, C. (1987). The Development of A Method For Traffic Safety Evaluation:
The Swedish Traffic Conflicts Technique. Swedia: Lund University.
Stover dan Koepke. (1998). Transportation and Development. New Jersey: Prentice Hal.
Warpani, S. (1993), Rekayasa Lalu Lintas. Jakarta: Barata Karya Aksara.
Abbas, Salim. 2000. Manajemen Transportasi. Cetakan Pertama. Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia
Djoko Setijowarno, R. B. Frazila, 2001, Pengantar Sistem Transportasi, Semarang: Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata
Miro, F. 2005. Perencanaan Transportasi untuk Mahasiswa, Perencana, dan Praktisi. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Nasution, Arman Hakim. 2008. Perencanaan dan Pengendalian Produksi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu
Ofyar, Tamin Z. (2008). Perencanaan, pemodelan, dan rekayasa transportasi: Teori contoh soal, dan aplikasi. Bandung: ITB
Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum. (2012). Panduan Teknis 1 Rekayasa Keselamatan Jalan. Jakarta: Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum.
Khisty.C.J, Kent L.B. (2005). Dasar-dasar Rekayasa Transportasi Jilid 1.Jakarta: Erlangga
Black, Jhon. (1993). Traffic ImpactAssesment. Jakarta: Erlangga
Lawalata, G.M. (2010). Studi Konflik lalu Lintas (Studi Kasus Satu Simpang 3 Di Kota Bandung) (Traffic Conflict Study As Evaluation Tools Of Traffic Management:Case Study At One T-Intersection in Bandung). Bandung. Pusat Litbang Jalan dan Jembatan.
Muis,Z.A dan Agung, M. Perbandingan Kinerja Simpang Berdasarkan program Kaji dan Sidra (Stufi Kasus : Simpang Setia Budi – DR.Mansyur dan DR.Mansyur – Jamin Ginting). Medan. Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Prima Juanita Romadhona, Shafira Artistika. (2020). Pengaruh Penutupan Perlintasan Sebidang Kereta Api Di Jalan H.O.S. Cokroaminoto, Yogyakarta. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil (Jrs-Unand). 16 (2) 119-131