Article Sidebar

Download
Download PDF

Main Article Content

Abstract

Transformasi digital yang berlangsung di industri konstruksi menghadirkan peluang sekaligus tantangan bagi organisasi di negara berkembang, terutama terkait inklusivitas tenaga kerja. Di tengah adopsi sistem digital seperti Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) dan Human Resource Information System (HRIS) untuk meningkatkan efisiensi operasional, proses transformasi ini berlangsung dalam budaya organisasi yang maskulin dan secara historis mengesampingkan karyawan perempuan. Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi bagaimana digital capability dan work-life balance membentuk women’s career sustainability pada PT XYZ, sebuah perusahaan konstruksi yang didominasi laki-laki dan sedang mengalami transformasi digital di Gresik, Jawa Timur. Menggunakan desain single case study kualitatif, penelitian ini melibatkan sepuluh informan perempuan pada level staf hingga manajerial yang dipilih melalui purposive sampling, dengan data yang dianalisis menggunakan thematic analysis. Hasil penelitian mengidentifikasi tiga tema utama. Pertama, digital capability dibangun secara mandiri tanpa dukungan pelatihan formal; namun, transformasi digital secara paradoks justru mengaburkan batas work-life balance melalui budaya always-on. Kedua, perempuan menghadapi glass ceiling halus dalam distribusi kepercayaan dan peluang karier, disertai ketidakamanan fisik dan psikologis di lapangan. Ketiga, kekuatan bertahan perempuan bersumber dari resiliensi personal, bukan dari kebijakan organisasi formal yang belum responsif gender. Temuan ini memperluas Sustainable Career Theory dengan mengintegrasikan paradoks adopsi digital dalam dinamika gender pada konteks negara berkembang.

Keywords

transformasi digital digital capability work-life balance women's career sustainability industri konstruksi

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Aulya, R., & Dwi Syahputra, M. F. (2026). Digital Capability dan Work-Life Balance: Women’s Career Sustainability pada Perusahaan Konstruksi yang Didominasi Laki-Laki. Economics and Digital Business Review, 7(2), 739–752. https://doi.org/10.37531/ecotal.v7i2.4077
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Al Salaheen, M., Alaloul, W. S., Musarat, M. A., Bin Johari, M. A., Alzubi, K. M., & Alawag, A. M. (2024). Women career in construction industry after industrial revolution 4.0 norm. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100277
  2. Audrin, B., Audrin, C., & Salamin, X. (2024). Digital skills at work: Conceptual development and empirical validation of a measurement scale. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 202, 123279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123279
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Keadaan Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Agustus 2024. Badan Pusat Statistik Republik Indonesia. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2024/12/09/6f1fd1036968c8a28e4cfe26/keadaan-angkatan-kerja-di-indonesia-agustus-2024.html
  4. Bisht, N. S., Trusson, C., Siwale, J., & Ravishankar, M. N. (2023). Enhanced job satisfaction under tighter technological control: The paradoxical outcomes of digitalisation. New Technology, Work and Employment, 38(2), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12222
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
  7. Chathurangi, B. N. M., Kamardeen, I., & Firose, M. M. (2025). Career sustainability of women professionals in the Sri Lankan construction industry. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-06-2025-0343
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  9. De Vos, A., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Akkermans, J. (2020). Sustainable careers: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117, Article 103196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.06.011
  10. Galdiero, C., Maltempo, C., Marrapodi, R., & Martinez, M. (2024). Gender Diversity: An Opportunity for Socially Inclusive Human Resource Management Policies for Organizational Sustainability. Social Sciences, 13(3), Article 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13030173
  11. Greer, T. W., & Kirk, A. F. (2022). Overcoming Barriers to Women’s Career Transitions: A Systematic Review of Social Support Types and Providers. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 777110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.777110
  12. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  13. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.
  14. Müller, C., Scheffer, A., Macke, J., & Vaclavik, M. C. (2022). Towards Career Sustainability: A Systematic Review to Guide Future Research. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 19(4), Article e220108. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2022220108
  15. O’Brien, W., Hanlon, C., & Apostolopoulos, V. (2023). Women as leaders in male-dominated sectors: A bifocal analysis of gendered organizational practices. Gender, Work and Organization, 30(6), 1867–1884. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13019
  16. Pillay-Naidoo, D., & Vermeulen, C. (2023). Seeking support through solidarity: female leader’s experiences of workplace solidarity in male-dominated professions. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1119911. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1119911
  17. Rostiyanti, S. F., Hansen, S., & Harison, S. (2020). Understanding the barriers to women’s career in construction industry: Indonesian perspective. International Journal of Construction Supply Chain Management, 10(4), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.14424/ijcscm100420-267-283
  18. Sahni, S., Kaushal, L. A., & Gupta, P. (2025). Gendered differences and strategies for work-life balance: A systematic review based on the social ecological framework perspective. Acta Psychologica, 256, Article 105019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105019
  19. Septiana, A. N., & Haryanti, R. H. (2023). Glass Ceiling pada Pekerja Perempuan: Studi Literatur. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 12(1), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v12i1.58384
  20. Shabira, R. F., & Er, M. (2026). Navigating Digital Careers: A Multi-Case Study of Women’s Career Decisions in Indonesia’s IT Sector. ISI: Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 8(1), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i1.1390
  21. Suhardiman, M., & Saragih, S. (2022). Technostress Dan Work Life Balance Pada Karyawan: Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. INOBIS: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis dan Manajemen Indonesia, 6(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.31842/jurnalinobis.v6i1.255
  22. Tunji-Olayeni, P., Aigbavboa, C., Oke, A., & Adejola, F. (2024). The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR): Enhancing the Roles of Women in the Construction Industry. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1342(1), 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1342/1/012025
  23. Yan, D., Wang, C. C., & Sunindijo, R. Y. (2024). Framework for Promoting Women’s Career Development across Career Stages in the Construction Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(7), Article 04024044. https://doi.org/10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-14644
  24. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.