Article Sidebar

Download
Download PDF

Main Article Content

Abstract

Sustainable agricultural economics has emerged as an increasingly important research field in response to global challenges such as climate change, environmental degradation, food insecurity, and resource scarcity. Despite the growing volume of scholarly publications, the existing literature remains fragmented across multiple themes, methodologies, and disciplinary perspectives, limiting comprehensive understanding of the field’s intellectual structure and future research directions. Therefore, this study aims to: (1) examine whether sustainable agricultural economics continues to be a significant area for future academic inquiry, (2) analyze the current research landscape and distribution within the field, and (3) identify key theoretical and practical implications for advancing future research. This study employs a combined Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and bibliometric analysis approach following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Data were collected from the Scopus database in May 2026 using structured keyword combinations related to agricultural economics and sustainability. Bibliometric mapping was conducted using VOSviewer to analyze publication trends, geographical distribution, institutional productivity, journal sources, authorship patterns, and keyword co-occurrence networks. Additionally, thematic analysis was applied to identify dominant research themes and emerging scholarly trends. The findings reveal that sustainable agricultural economics is a rapidly expanding and highly relevant field of academic inquiry. Publication trends demonstrate significant growth from only two publications in 1989 to 186 publications in 2025 and 161 publications in 2026. China emerged as the dominant contributor in terms of publication output and institutional productivity, while leading journals included the Journal of Environmental Management and the Journal of Cleaner Production. Thematic analysis indicates that the literature is increasingly focused on sustainable development, agricultural sustainability, economic analysis, crop production, circular economy practices, and technological innovation such as precision agriculture and digital farming systems. The study concludes that sustainable agricultural economics has evolved into a multidisciplinary and strategically important research domain integrating economic performance, environmental sustainability, technological adaptation, and social resilience. Future research should further explore sustainability governance, policy effectiveness, financial mechanisms, socio-economic inclusiveness, and climate-resilient agricultural systems to strengthen sustainable global food systems and long-term agricultural development.

Keywords

ekonomi pertanian berkelanjutan, tinjauan pustaka sistematis, analisis bibliometrik, keberlanjutan, ekonomi pertanian, PRISMA, VOSviewer

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Normasari, R., Kawuwung, S., & Ambalao, S. (2026). Sustainable Agricultural Economics: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Economics and Digital Business Review, 7(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.37531/ecotal.v7i2.3893
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ahmad, N., Khan, H. M. W. A., Khaliq, A., ul Hassan, M., Afzal, M. S., ul Sher, R., Yasin, M., Yasin, M., & Hussain, F. (2022). Evaluation of Agronomic, Entomological and Breeding Aspects of Novel Sugarcane Clone under Climate Change Scenario. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research Series B: Biological Sciences, 65(2), 173–178. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85171639756?origin=resultslist
  2. Balasamy, S., Ganesan, H., & Sundramoorthy, A. K. (2026). Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles with Enhanced Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Biocompatible Properties. Micro and Nanosystems. https://doi.org/10.2174/0118764029388322251128063554
  3. Cao, X., Xu, Y., Li, M., Fu, Q., Xu, X., & Zhang, F. (2022). A modeling framework for the dynamic correlation between agricultural sustainability and the water-land nexus under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131270
  4. Dey, P., Tripathy, S., Pruseth, K. L., Singh, R., Mondal, G., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2026). Integrated source apportionment, ecological risk assessment, and machine learning-based human health risk evaluation of potentially toxic elements in stream sediments of Odisha, eastern India. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 48(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-026-03217-5
  5. Dhali, S., Malik, A., Sharma, S., & Raliya, R. (2026). Hydrothermal Liquefaction-Based extraction of biogenic silica and biocrude from diatoms cultivated in rice straw hydrolysate. Bioresource Technology, 455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2026.134849
  6. Li, H., Li, M., Fu, Q., Singh, V. P., Liu, D., & Xu, Y. (2023). An optimization approach of water-food-energy nexus in agro-forestry-livestock system under uncertain water supply. Journal of Cleaner Production, 407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137116
  7. Li, M., Fu, Q., Singh, V. P., Liu, D., & Li, J. (2020). Optimization of sustainable bioenergy production considering energy-food-water-land nexus and livestock manure under uncertainty. Agricultural Systems, 184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102900
  8. Li, M., Xue, M., Gai, Z., Chen, Y., Xu, Y., Cao, K., & Fu, Q. (2026). Meta-Analysis-Based Tillage Systems Optimization Promotes Synergy Among Crop Productivity, Water Use Efficiency and Carbon Emissions Under Changing Environments. Land Degradation and Development, 37(2), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70118
  9. Liu, R., Qu, X., Gao, Z., Luan, Y., Zheng, Y., Wu, L., Shang, T., Teng, T., & Shi, B. (2026). Bacillus velezensis enhances the conversion of swine manure into high-quality insect protein via augmented histidine metabolism in Hermetia illucens larvae. Bioresource Technology, 455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2026.134865
  10. Miao, M., Lu, W., Yu, B., Wang, Y., & Yin, X. (2026). Advancing cleaner grain production: How can land certification promote the decoupling between grain production and carbon emissions? Journal of Cleaner Production, 544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.147686
  11. Muir, K. (1989). The potential role of indigenous resources in the economic development of arid environments in Sub‐Saharan Africa: The case of wildlife utilization in Zimbabwe. Society and Natural Resources, 2(1), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941928909380694
  12. Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-wilson, E., Mcdonald, S., … Prisma, M. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration : updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
  13. Rui, D., Wenjiao, S., Changhe, L., Hongwei, L., Xiaoli, S., Xiangzheng, D., & Jiaying, C. (2022). Future unbalanced-trends of grain supply and demand on the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Cleaner Production, 367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132993
  14. Sisodia, G. S., Alshamsi, R., & Sergi, B. S. (2021). Business valuation strategy for new hydroponic farm development – a proposal towards sustainable agriculture development in United Arab Emirates. British Food Journal, 123(4), 1560–1577. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2020-0557
  15. Sousa, J. S. D., Almeida, G. L. P. D., Pandorfi, H., Santos, J. A., Montenegro, A. A. D. A., Marinho, G. D. P. A., Sousa, A. M. O. D., & Silva, M. V. D. (2025). Geotechnologies in the identification of areas suitable for the construction of underground dams in the Brazilian semiarid region. Journal of Hydrology, 662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134017
  16. Tong, H., Wang, Q., Zou, P., & Zhu, G. (2026). Territorial Space Transformation and Sustainability Pathways in Ecologically Fragile Zones: Multi-Scenario Simulation of Urban-Agricultural-Ecological Nexus in the Gansu-Qinghai Contiguous Region of the Upper Yellow River. Land Degradation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70587
  17. Weinschenck, G. (1989). From subsistence households to sustainable farming environment systems. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 28(3–4), 242–253. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0024823643?origin=resultslist
  18. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  19. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  20. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
  21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  22. Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342.
  23. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
  24. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.
  25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  26. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.
  27. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  28. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
  29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  30. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.
  31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629