Main Article Content

Abstract

The rise of digital payment systems, particularly e-money, is poised to revolutionize liquidity dynamics and monetary transmission processes in Indonesia. This research seeks to dissect the impact of e-money transactions on the money supply (M2), factoring in inflation and credit card transaction values. Employing a quantitative methodology, the study draws on monthly time series data from 2022 to 2024, sourced from Bank Indonesia and the Central Statistical Agency. The analytical framework is grounded in multiple linear regression utilizing Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), alongside classical assumption testing to ensure valid estimations. The findings reveal that e-money exerts a positive and significant influence on the money supply, whereas credit card transactions show a negative and significant impact, and inflation does not yield any significant effect. These results underscore a transformation in money supply dynamics, increasingly shaped by shifts in transaction behavior and the heightened utilization of digital payment tools, in contrast to traditional monetary influences. This signifies a realignment in monetary transmission mechanisms, where liquidity now reflects not only inflationary pressures but also the velocity of money circulation propelled by the digitization of payments. The policy implications highlight the necessity of weaving the advancement of digital payment systems into the fabric of monetary policy formulation and liquidity management.

Article Details

How to Cite
Husnia, N., & Hasmarini, M. I. (2026). Analysis of the Impact of E-Money on the Money Supply in Indonesia. Economics and Digital Business Review, 7(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.37531/ecotal.v7i1.3610

References

  1. Adamy, H. B., Chaidir, T., & Suprapti, I. A. P. (2024). Analisis Pengaruh E-Money, Alat Pembayaran Menggunakan Kartu (APMK), dan QRIS Terhadap Jumlah Uang Beredar Di Indonesia Periode Juli 2020-Juli 2023. Jurnal Konstanta, 3(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.29303/konstanta.v3i2.1107
  2. Bank Indonesia. (2020). Apa itu Uang Elektronik. Bank Indonesia. https://www.bi.go.id/id/edukasi/Pages/Apa-itu-Uang-Elektronik.aspx?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  3. Bordo, M. D., & Levin, A. T. (2022). Central bank digital currency and the future of monetary policy. In Central Bank Digital Currency and the Future of Monetary Policy: Bordo, Michael D.| uLevin, Andrew T. [Sl]: SSRN.
  4. Brown, M., Hentschel, N., Mettler, H., & Stix, H. (2022). The convenience of electronic payments and consumer cash demand. Journal of Monetary Economics, 130, 86–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2022.06.001
  5. Ferlicia, S., Suhel, S., & Andaiyani, S. (2022). Non-Cash Instruments and Money Supply in Indonesia During Pandemic Covid-19. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 11, 383–398. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjie.v11i2.26491
  6. Hermawan, D., Lie, D., Sasongko, A., & Yusan, R. I. (2024). Money velocity, digital currency and inflation dynamics in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 60(3), 305–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2024.2398347
  7. Puspitasari, D., Yunian, A. A., & Raharti, R. (2024). Dynamics of Inflation in Indonesia: The Role of CPI, E-Money, Money Supply (M1), and Exchange Rate. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 9(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.38043/jiab.v9i1.4964
  8. Soedarmono, W., Gunadi, I., Pambudi, S., & Nurhayati, T. (2023). Monetary policy, funding liquidity, and undisbursed loans in Indonesia: The bank lending channel revisited. Journal of Economics and Business, 127, 106134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2023.106134
  9. Thoyyibah, M. (2024). Analysis of The Influence of The Value of Non-Cash Payment Transactions on The Amount of Money Supply in Indonesia. Journal of Developing Economies (JDE), 9(2). https://doi.org/10.20473/jde.v9i2.55320
  10. Ulfah, C. F., & Suriani, S. (2025). Digital Economy Dynamics: How E-Money, Debit Cards, Inflation, and Exchange Rates Shape Money Demand Stability in Indonesia. Grimsa Journal of Business and Economics Studies, 2(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.61975/gjbes.v2i1.37