Main Article Content

Abstract

The rise of Virtual Influencers (VIs) in digital marketing has revolutionized the way brands engage with consumers, yet the underlying factors that drive their adoption and interaction remain largely unexplored, particularly in emerging markets such as Indonesia. This study delves into the Behavioral Intention to Use (BIU) Virtual Influencers, applying the Technology Acceptance Model 2 (TAM2) to identify key determinants like Perceived Usefulness (PU), Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Social Influence (SI), and Facilitating Conditions (FC). Furthermore, the research investigates the mediating roles of Attitude Toward Using (ATU) and Cognitive Absorption (CA). Through an online survey of 198 Indonesian social media users familiar with AI applications, the results reveal that PU and PEOU directly influence ATU, which in turn significantly shapes BIU. SI and FC exert both direct and indirect effects via ATU and CA. These findings highlight the critical role of cognitive and social factors in driving consumer engagement with VIs in Indonesia, offering valuable insights for businesses aiming to capitalize on this emerging trend. The study extends traditional technology adoption models, calling for further exploration of cultural dynamics and long-term impacts on consumer behavior.

Keywords

Virtual Influencers, TAM2, Social Influence, Cognitive Absorption, Indonesia

Article Details

Author Biographies

Devi Yurisca Bernanda, Universitas Bunda Mulia

Dosen Program Studi Bisnis Digital, Universitas Bunda Mulia, Jakarta

Arief Perdana Kumaat, Politeknik Negeri Manado

Dosen Manajemen Pemasaran, Politeknik Negeri Manado

Fidelia Novena Doa, Universitas Bunda Mulia

Mahasiswa Program Studi Bisnis Digital, Universitas Bunda Mulia, Jakarta

How to Cite
Kembau, A. S., Bernanda, D. Y., Kumaat, A. P., & Doa, F. N. . (2025). What Drives the Adoption of Virtual Influencers in Indonesia? A TAM2 Perspective on Social Influence and Cognitive Absorption. Economics and Digital Business Review, 6(1), 575–591. Retrieved from https://ojs.stieamkop.ac.id/index.php/ecotal/article/view/2093

References

  1. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
  2. Agung, H., Marta, R. F., Kembau, A. S., Firellsya, G., Venness, V., Indrawan, G. B., & Christanti, C. (2023). Digital Business Communication Strategy Barometer: Stimulation of K-Pop Brand Ambassadors for Consumers of E-commerce Products in Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary, 1(4), 366-375.
  3. APJII. (2022). The 2022 Internet Survey Report of Indonesia. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. Retrieved from https://apjii.or.id/
  4. Arsenyan, J., & Mirowska, A. (2021). Almost human? A comparative case study on the social media presence of virtual influencers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 155, 102694.
  5. Bendary, N., & Al-Sahouly, I. (2018). Exploring the extension of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, UTAUT2, factors effect on perceived usefulness and ease of use on mobile commerce in Egypt. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 12(2).
  6. Bing, W. (2023). The global market for virtual influencers: Trends and predictions. Digital Marketing Insights, 14(2), 32-40.
  7. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  8. Castiblanco Jimenez, I. A., Cepeda García, L. C., Violante, M. G., Marcolin, F., & Vezzetti, E. (2020). Commonly used external TAM variables in e-learning, agriculture and virtual reality applications. Future Internet, 13(1), 7.
  9. Christanti, C., & Kembau, A. S. (2024). Pengaruh Strategi Pemasaran Konten Dan Afiliasi Terhadap Pembelian Impulsif: Peran Mediasi Pemasaran Viral Dan Kepercayaan. Modus, 36(2), 198-223.
  10. Dabiran, E., Farivar, S., Wang, F., & Grant, G. (2024). Virtually human: anthropomorphism in virtual influencer marketing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 79, 103797.
  11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  12. Gammarano, I. D. J. L. P., Dholakia, N., Arruda Filho, E. J. M., & Dholakia, R. R. (2024). Beyond influence: unraveling the complex tapestry of digital influencer dynamics in hyperconnected cultures. European Journal of Marketing.
  13. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
  14. Hofeditz, L., Nissen, A., Schütte, R., & Mirbabaie, M. (2022). Trust me, I’m an influencer! A comparison of perceived trust in human and virtual influencers. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 38(9), 807-819.
  15. Firellsya, G., Kembau, A. S., Bernanda, D. Y., & Christin, L. (2024). Tren Belanja Online Wanita Gen-Z: Eksplorasi Faktor-Faktor di Balik Dominasi Wanita Gen-Z pada Platform Shopee Menggunakan Model UTAUT2. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, 184-196.
  16. Jhawar, A., Kumar, P., & Varshney, S. (2023). The emergence of virtual influencers: a shift in the influencer marketing paradigm. Young Consumers, 24(4), 468-484.
  17. Kim, J., Kim, M., & Lee, S. M. (2024). Unlocking Trust Dynamics: An Exploration of Playfulness, Expertise, and Consumer Behavior in Virtual Influencer Marketing. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-13.
  18. Lankton, N. K., & McKnight, D. H. (2011). Examination of the dimensionality of trust and trusting behavior in Internet systems. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 18(1), 1-27.
  19. Laimeheriwa, I. B., & Kembau, A. S. (2024). Pengaruh kepercayaan akan simulasi virtual try on terhadap niat beli di e-commerce. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 9(1), 241-257. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i1.4236
  20. Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: Implications for online consumer behavior and future research. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 45, 15-30.
  21. Lou, C., Kiew, S. T. J., Chen, T., Lee, T. Y. M., Ong, J. E. C., & Phua, Z. (2023). Authentically fake? How consumers respond to the influence of virtual influencers. Journal of Advertising, 52(4), 540-557.
  22. Marwick, A. E. (2015). Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture, 27(1), 137-160.
  23. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
  24. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  25. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328-376.
  26. Venkatesh, V. (2022). Adoption and use of AI tools: a research agenda grounded in UTAUT. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1), 641-652.
  27. Wan, A., & Jiang, M. (2023). Can virtual influencers replace human influencers in live-streaming e-commerce? An exploratory study from practitioners’ and consumers’ perspectives. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 44(3), 332-372.
  28. We Are Social & Hootsuite. (2023). Digital 2023: Indonesia report. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-indonesia
  29. Yang, E., Kembau, A. S., Tarigan, A., & Lendo, F. B. (2024). The Strategic Role Of Consumer Ethnocentrism, Social Media Marketing, And Brand Ambassadorship In Shaping Purchase Decisions For Local Indonesian Skincare Brands On E-Commerce Platforms. Jmbi Unsrat (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis dan Inovasi Universitas Sam Ratulangi)., 11(1), 1342-1360.