Article Sidebar

Download
PDF

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of public accountability, employee performance, supervision, and legislation on the quality of financial reports in preventing fraud at the Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency (BPKAD) of West Papua Province. This study uses a quantitative approach with a questionnaire survey of BPKAD employees. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression preceded by validity, reliability, and classical assumption tests to ensure the model's feasibility. The results show that public accountability and employee performance do not significantly affect the quality of financial statements in the context of fraud prevention. Conversely, supervision and compliance with laws and regulations have a significant and positive effect on the quality of financial statements. Simultaneously, these four variables contribute to the production of more reliable financial reports, thereby enhancing fraud prevention. These findings emphasize the importance of strengthening the functions of supervision and regulatory compliance in regional financial management, accompanied by capacity-building for officials and the reinforcement of a culture of integrity, so that financial reports not only meet formal compliance requirements but also reflect integrity. However, they are also effective tools for public accountability and fraud prevention.

Keywords

public accountability employee performance supervision laws regulations quality of financial reports

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Sudarwadi, H., Ijo, E. Y. A. J., Sumari, J., & Sudarwadi, D. (2026). The Effect of Public Accountability, Employee Performance, Supervision, and Legislation on the Quality of Financial Reports in Preventing Fraud (A Study of the West Papua Provincial BPKAD Office). Amkop Management Accounting Review (AMAR), 5(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.37531/amar.v6i1.3398
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Agustiani, N. H., Ismiyati, I., Sholikah, M., Hanum, H. L., & Permana, D. F. (2023). The Improvement Of Employee Performance Through Employee Competence, Work Facilities, Work Discipline, And Organizational Communication. Jurnal Ekonomi, 12(04), 2565–2575. https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Ekonomi/article/view/2631
  2. Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2024). Agency theory, corporate governance and corruption: an integrative literature review approach. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2337893. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2337893
  3. Alsobaey, T. M., & Alkhateeb, F. Q. (2025). A Contextual Analysis of Factors Influencing Employee Performance in the Public Sector: The Case of Bahrain. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age (IJPADA), 12(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJPADA.376011
  4. Amin, H., Malik, M., & Scheepers, H. (2024). An agency-theory unpacking of how monitoring and evaluation affect the impact of international development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 42(8), 102654. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102654
  5. Ariyanti, D. O., Ningsih, W. F., & Rakhmawati, R. (2023). Pengaruh Implementasi Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan, Good Governance, Akuntabilitas Dan Transparansi Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Daerah (Studi Kasus Pada Badan Keuangan Dan Aset Daerah Kabupaten Situbondo). SIFEBRI’S, 1(1), 108–125. https://www.unars.ac.id/ojs/index.php/sifebri/article/view/3315
  6. Chen, Y., Zhao, C., Xu, Y., Nie, C., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Deep Learning in Financial Fraud Detection: Innovations, Challenges, and Applications. Data Science and Management. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2025.08.002
  7. Elagaili, T. A., Azam, S. M. F., Tham, J., & Khatibi, A. (2025). Employee Performance in Public Sector: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Trends and Thematic Development. International Review of Management and Marketing, 15(6), 10. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.20150
  8. Eliana, E., Astuti, I. N., Ivana, F., Suryafatma, S., & Juned, V. (2023). The Influence of the Use of Information Technology and Public Accountability on the Quality of Financial Reports in Government Organizations. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(11), 116. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.1866
  9. Emela, S., Gemina, D., & Kartini, T. (2024). Employee performance based on work motivation, work environment, and work discipline. Jurnal Ekonomi, 13(01), 1057–1068. https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Ekonomi/article/view/3555
  10. Ernawati, D. (2019). Pengaruh kualitas produk, inovasi produk dan promosi terhadap keputusan pembelian produk Hi Jack sandals Bandung. JWM (Jurnal Wawasan Manajemen), 7(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.20527/jwmthemanagementinsightjournal.v7i1.75
  11. Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi analisis multivariete dengan program IBM SPSS 23.
  12. Handayani, R. (2023). Pengaruh Sistem Informasi Akuntansi, Sistem Pengendalian Internal Dan Kinerja Pegawai Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan. Akuntansi.
  13. Hendrastuti, R., & Harahap, R. (2023). Agency theory: Review of the theory and current research. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 10, 85. https://doi.org/10.17977/um004v10i12023p085
  14. Irafah, S., Sari, E. N., & Muhyarsyah, M. (2020). Pengaruh Kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia, Peran Internal Audit, dan Kesuksesan Penerapan Sistem Informasi Keuangan Daerah terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 8(2), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v8i2.21775
  15. Istiqomah, D., & Kasmari, K. (2025). Human Capital and Employee Performance: The Mediating Role of Training and Digital Innovation. International Journal of Economics and Management Research, 4(3), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.55606/ijemr.v4i3.556
  16. Jatmiko, B., Haya, B. S., & Laras, T. (2024). Sector public accountability performance measurement: The role of internal factors public sector and accountability as intervening. Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.32670/fairvalue.v6i3.4349
  17. Kristiyani, D., & Hamidah, H. (2020). Model penerapan akuntansi sektor publik untuk mencegah fraud pada sektor publik di era digital. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 22(2), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.34208/JBA.V22I2.732
  18. Li, G., Wang, S., & Feng, Y. (2024). Making differences work: Financial fraud detection based on multi-subject perceptions. Emerging Markets Review, 60, 101134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101134
  19. Liana, E., & Hartono, H. (2024). Factors Affecting Employee Performance: Analysis of Work-Life Balance, Competence, Employee Welfare, and Career Development. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary, 3(2 SE-Articles), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.38035/ijam.v3i2.618
  20. Lillrank, P. (2003). The quality of information. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(6), 691–703. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710310482131
  21. Lubis, H. Z., Sari, M., Ramadhany, A. A., Ovami, D. C., & Brutu, I. R. (2024). Effect of internal audit, internal control, and audit quality on fraud prevention: Evidence from the public sector in Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.04
  22. Mabel, S. N., Payamta, P., & Winarna, J. (2025). The development of fraud prevention policies in the public sector: A bibliometric analysis. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 119–133. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol29.iss1.art10
  23. Mardiasmo. (2009). Akuntansi sektor publik. Yogyakarta: Andi.
  24. Mawuntu, N. S., Manossoh, H., & Afandi, D. (2020). Pengaruh Kepatuhan Dan Pengawasan Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Empiris Pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Minahasa Utara). Going Concern : Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 15(2), 260–268. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/gc/article/view/28230
  25. Mobilingo, D. S., Hailah, & Nirwana. (2024). The Role of Technology Integration in Public Sector Accounting Fraud Prevention Efforts. Jurnal Akuntansi, Manajemen, Dan Perencanaan Kebijakan, 2(2 SE-Articles), 6. https://doi.org/10.47134/jampk.v2i2.471
  26. Nadirsyah, Indriani, M., & Mulyany, R. (2024). Enhancing fraud prevention and internal control: the key role of internal audit in public sector governance. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2382389. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2382389
  27. Nofianto, E., & Prastiwi, A. (2025). Pencegahan Fraud Di Sektor Publik: Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Akuntansi STIE Muhammadiyah Palopo, 11(1), 146–164. https://journal.stiem.ac.id/index.php/jurakun/article/view/2377.
  28. Novita, K., Rahayu, S., Gede, L., Dewi, K., & Ekonomi, J. (2022). Pengaruh transparansi dan pengawasan keuangan daerah terhadap kualitas laporan keuangan daerah buleleng. JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi) Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 13(2), 464–471. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/S1ak/article/view/36451
  29. Nurjanah, N., & Sastrodiharjo, I. (2021). Pengaruh Penerapan Akuntansi Sektor Publik, Good Governance, dan Pengawasan Pengelolaan Keuangan terhadap Pencegahan Fraud. Media Ilmiah Akuntansi, 9(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.34208/mia.v9i2.6
  30. Pangaribuan, D. (2020). Governance practices government, of accountability performance and implementation of risk management and implications for fraud detection and prevention. International Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 1(2), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.25105/IJCA.V1I2.6167
  31. Payamta, P., & Setyaningsih, T. (2025). Enhancing audit quality to detect financial statement fraud at public accounting firms member of OAI Solusi Manajemen Nusantara. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 9, 7403. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd7403
  32. Purwanti, L., Triyuwono, I., Ichsan, M., Ramadhani, F. N., & Arief Effendi, S. (2024). Formal-cultural accountability: a [new] paradigm of public accountability. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2297756. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2297756
  33. Putri, R. D., & Hendaris, R. B. (2025). Public Sector Accountability and Performance : The Influence of Institutional Scale , Legislative Oversight , and Supreme Audit Judgements Keywords : Pengaruh Ukuran Pemerintah Daerah , Ukuran Legislatif , dan Opini Audit BPK terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pem. Jurnal Akuntansi, 35(6), 1752–1771. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2025.v35.i06.p17
  34. Ranggawidjaja, R. (1998). Pengantar Ilmu Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
  35. Ririhena, S. W., & Richard, Y. F. (2022). Agency relations, accountability, and their relation to local government public value creation. International Journal of Science and Society, 4(3), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v4i3.506
  36. Rizki, I. P., Hali, A., & Andi, K. (2024). The influence of transparency, governance, and financial accountability in managing financial reporting in the public sector. International Journal of Educational and Life Sciences, 2(10), 1165–1180. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijels.v2i10.2571
  37. Sari, F. M., Safitri, A., & Elshifa, A. (2024). Pengaruh Penerapan Akuntansi Sektor Publik dan Kualitas Aparatur Pemerintah terhadap Pencegahan Fraud Laporan Keuangan (Studi Empiris pada Kota Pekalongan). Journal of Social and Policy Issues, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.58835/jspi.v4i2.331
  38. Sattu, Y., Alam, S., & Nohong, M. (2020). Analysis of accountability performance of financial management in Hasanuddin university as legal entity state university. Hasanuddin Journal of Business Strategy, 2(3), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.26487/hjbs.v2i3.359
  39. Sismiati, S., Sulaiman, S., Rudhan, A. M., Nurlela, N., Dema, Y., Darmawansyah, I., Rahmawan, R., & Che-Ni, H. (2025). Determination of Employee Performance: Analysis of Leadership, Competence, and Discipline through Employee Retention. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 13(4 SE-Articles), 2037–2046. https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v13i4.3305
  40. Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  41. Sun, G., Ling, Z., Li, Y., & Xie, C. (2025). Artificial intelligence and financial fraud. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 93, 102830. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102830
  42. Umar, H., Indriani, A., & Purba, R. B. (2019). The Determinant Fraud Prevention Of Quality Local Government â€TM S FINANCIAL REPORT. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis: Jurnal Program Studi Akuntansi, 5(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.31289/JAB.V5I1.2310
  43. Yani, A. (2002). Hubungan keuangan antara pemerintah pusat dan daerah di Indonesia. Library.Stik-Ptik.Ac.Id.
  44. Yanti, E. (2020). Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Akuntansi Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah:(Studi Kasus Pada Dinas Prasarana Jalan, Tata Ruang dan Permukiman Sumbar). Pareso Jurnal, 2(2), 315–319. https://ejurnal-unespadang.ac.id/index.php/PJ/article/view/124
  45. Yasis, U. (2024). Influence of Government Accounting Standards, Systems Internal Control, Regulatory Compliance Legislation on Quality Financial Statements. International Journal of Science and Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v6i1.1008
  46. Yasmin, Y., Winarningsih, S., & Mulyanti, S. (2021). The effect of the internal control system effectiveness and the quality of financial reporting and its impact on fraud prevention of Bandung regency. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 5(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v5i1.25785
  47. Yunia, D., & Muttaqin, G. F. (2022). The Influence of The Quality of Financial Reports on The Performance of Public Sector Organizations. Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(2), 2339–2436. https://doi.org/10.30656/jak.v9i2.4606
  48. Zubaidah, A., & Nugraeni, N. (2023). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Dan Transparansi Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Sleman. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA), 7(3 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v7i3.3475

Similar Articles

<< < 20 21 22 23 24 25 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.