Article Sidebar

Download
PDF

Main Article Content

Abstract

This condition can lead to health issues, ranging from mild ailments like heat rash and heat cramps to serious conditions such as heat stroke (Parsons, 1993). Consequently, controlling thermal conditions within buildings is a crucial aspect, particularly for structures used for intensive and sustained activities. According to ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers), thermal comfort is the state in which building occupants are satisfied with the surrounding environmental temperature. Physical observation results (average temperature of 31.6°C, lighting of 163 Lux, and noise level of 87 dB) clearly indicate that the existing workshop conditions do not yet meet the standards set. (Regulation of the Minister of Manpower) No. 5 of 2018 and the ILO. Workstation conditions have a positive and significant effect on the work outcomes of students in the Motorcycle Engineering (TSM) program at SMK 1 Denpasar during practical training. This implies that the better the implementation of workstation conditions, the higher the students' work outcomes. Workstation conditions have a positive and significant effect on student comfort during practical training in the TSM program at SMK 1 Denpasar. This implies that the better the implementation of workstation conditions, the greater the level of student comfort. Student comfort has a positive and significant effect on the work outcomes of students in the TSM program at SMK 1 Denpasar during practical training. This implies that the higher the level of student comfort, the higher the students' work outcomes. Student comfort acts as a partial mediating variable in the influence of workstation conditions on the work outcomes of students in the TSM program at SMK 1 Denpasar during practical training.

Keywords

Workstation Ergonomics, Comfort and Practical Work Outcome

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rafsandita, I. G. L. Y., Priambadi, I. G. N., & Komaladewi, A. I. A. S. (2026). Ergonomic Evaluation of Workstations Regarding Comfort and Practical Work Outcomes for TSM Students at SMK N 1 Denpasar. Amkop Management Accounting Review (AMAR), 6(2), 365–370. https://doi.org/10.37531/amar.v6i2.4046
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Azwar, S. (2017). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  2. Baiti, A. A., & Munadi, S. Pengaruh Pengalaman Praktik terhadap Kesiapan Kerja Peserta didik SMK, Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi (2026).
  3. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  4. Bridger, R. S. (2018). Introduction to Human Factors and Ergonomics. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  5. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A Model of School Learning. Teachers College Record, 64(8), 723–733.
  6. Fisher, C. W., et al. (1980). Teaching Behaviors, Academic Learning Time, and Student Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4), 451–463.
  7. Fitri, H. M., dkk. Peningkatan Keterampilan Pra-Vokasional Peserta didik SMK melalui PjBL: Studi Literatur, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (2025).
  8. Grandjean, E., & Kroemer, K. H. E. (1997). Fitting the Task to the Human: A Textbook of Occupational Ergonomics. London: Taylor & Francis.
  9. Handayani, K., Kusumaningsih, W., & Sudana, I. M. Pengaruh Fasilitas Praktik terhadap Kualitas Pembelajaran di SMK (Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan, 2024).
  10. Hendrick, H. W., & Kleiner, B. M. (2001). Macroergonomics: An Introduction to Work System Design. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
  11. Hermanto, F. Y., dkk. The Need of Practical Teaching in Vocational High School, Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi (2019). Illuminating Engineering Society (IES). (2011). The Lighting Handbook: Reference & Application. New York: IESNA.
  12. ISO 1999. (2013). Acoustics — Estimation of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. International Organization for Standardization.
  13. ISO 8995-1. (2002). Lighting of Work Places – Part 1: Indoor. International Organization for Standardization.
  14. Jatmoko, D., dkk. Penilaian Keberhasilan Praktik Industri dalam SMK, Jurnal Pendidikan Sang Surya (2023).
  15. Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan RI. (2018). Permenaker No. 5 Tahun 2018 tentang Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Lingkungan Kerja.
  16. Kolcaba, K. (2003). Comfort Theory and Practice: A Vision for Holistic Health Care and Research. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  17. Kolcaba, K., & Kolcaba, R. (1991). An analysis of the concept of comfort. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16(11), 1301–1310.
  18. McArdle, W. D., Katch, F. I., & Katch, V. L. (2015). Exercise Physiology: Nutrition, Energy, and Human Performance. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  19. McAtamney, L., & Corlett, E. N. (1993). RULA: A survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Applied Ergonomics, 24(2), 91–99.
  20. Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  21. NIOSH. (1998). Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Noise Exposure. Cincinnati: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
  22. Nurhayani, dkk. Analysis of Productive and Educative Performance in SMK, International Journal of Educational and Life Sciences (2024).
  23. Parsons, K. (2014). Human Thermal Environments: The Effects of Hot, Moderate, and Cold Environments on Human Health, Comfort and Performance. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  24. Pheasant, S., & Haslegrave, C. M. (2006). Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics and the Design of Work. London: Taylor & Francis.
  25. Pitnawati, P., Iriani, T., & Saleh, R. Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Praktik pada Mata Pelajaran Produktif di SMK (Prosiding SPKTS, 2024).
  26. Prosser, C. A., & Quigley, T. H. (1950). Vocational Education in a Democracy. Chicago: American Technical Society.
  27. Rizqiyana, A., dkk. Strategi Guru dalam Pembelajaran Praktik Mata Pelajaran Produktif, Journal on Education (2023).
  28. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational Behavior. New York: Pearson Education.
  29. Sanders, M. S., & McCormick, E. J. (1993). Human Factors in Engineering and Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  30. Sarwono, J. (2012). Metode Riset Skripsi Pendekatan Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
  31. Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.
  32. Sedarmayanti. (2017). Sumber Daya Manusia dan Hasil kerja Kerja. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
  33. Sinungan, M. (2009). Hasil kerja: Apa dan Bagaimana. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  34. Sudira, P. (2016). TVET Abad XXI: Filosofi, Teori, Konsep, dan Strategi Pembelajaran Vokasional. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
  35. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  36. Wena, M. (2011). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  37. Wignarajah, G. (2003). Competitiveness Strategy in Developing Countries. London: Routledge
  38. Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459–482.

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.