Article Sidebar

Download
PDF

Main Article Content

Abstract

The post-pandemic paradigm shift in work arrangements has driven the massive adoption of hybrid and remote work systems in start-up companies; however, their impact on employee performance and productivity has not been comprehensively examined considering the mediating role of work-life balance. This study aims to analyze the influence of hybrid and remote work systems on work-life balance, performance, and productivity of start-up employees, as well as to examine the role of work-life balance as a mediating variable. A quantitative survey method was employed with 300 start-up employee respondents in Indonesia, analyzed using multiple linear regression and the Sobel Test. The results indicate that both hybrid and remote work systems have a significant positive effect on work-life balance, employee performance, and productivity. The hybrid system demonstrates a more dominant influence on work-life balance and productivity, while the remote system is more prominent in affecting individual performance. Work-life balance is proven to significantly mediate all relational pathways, with the strongest mediation effect found on the hybrid system's pathway to productivity (T = 4.308; p = 0.000). These findings imply that optimizing work-life balance is a key strategy in maximizing the impact of flexible work systems on start-up employee performance.

Keywords

Hybrid, Remote, Produktivitas, Kinerja, Start-Up, Work-Life Balance

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Vanessa, C., & Wisnu Putri, L. R. (2026). Analysis of the Influence of Hybrid and Remote Work Systems on Employee Performance and Productivity in Start-Ups: Work-Life Balance as a Mediating Variable . Amkop Management Accounting Review (AMAR), 6(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.37531/amar.v6i2.3862
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Alamanda, M. W., Riyanti, D., & Benedicta, P. (2023). Pengaruh Quality of Work Life Terhadap Job Perfomance Pada Karyawan Generasi Z Di Perusahaan Perintis (Startup) Di Jakarta. Jurnal Psikogenesis, 11(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.24854/jps.v11i2.2578
  2. Allen, T. D., Merlo, K., Lawrence, R. C., Slutsky, J., & Gray, C. E. (2021). Boundary Management and Work-Nonwork Balance While Working from Home. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12300
  3. Angreani, S., Virsa, S., Muchlis, N. A., Mustapa, A. M., Dayanti, C., & Ginting, B. (2025). Literatur Review : Work-Life Balance sebagai Faktor Penentu Produktivitas Karyawan pada Perusahaan Modern. Ekonomika45: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi Bisnis, Kewirausahaan, 13(1), 1338–1448. https://doi.org/10.30640/ekonomika45.v13i1.5759
  4. Aura, R. R., & Hutahaean, E. S. H. (2025). Pengaruh Work Life Balance Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Pada Generasi Z. Jurnal Price : Ekonomi Dan Akuntasi, 2(4), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14679709
  5. Bakker, A. B., & Vries, J. D. de. (2021). Job Demands–Resources theory and self-regulation: new explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 34(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695
  6. Beigi, M., Nayyeri, S., & Shirmohammadi, M. (2022). Steering wheels to make ends meet: Understanding stressors and coping strategies among app-based taxi drivers in Tehran. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 138, 103782. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103782
  7. Bonifacio, E. K. D., Ong, A. K. S., & Magana, M. C. (2025). Assessing the impact of longer workweeks on macroergonomics variables, work-life integration, employee satisfaction, and productivity among Filipino employees. Acta Psychologica, 260(June), 105580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105580
  8. Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C., & Michailidis, E. (2019). Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886
  9. Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. (2020). Work‐from‐anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42, 655–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3251
  10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and A Mixed-Method Approach. In SAGE Publication. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469237-3
  11. Fikri, Z. A., Nuryadi, A. F., Saputri, N. L. L., Iman, K. M., Paryanti, A. B., & Sangapan, L. H. (2026). Pengaruh Keuangan, Stres Kerja, Dan Work-Life Balance Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan Gen-Z. Journal of Capital Markets and Banking, 14(1), 346–373. https://doi.org/10.63607/jcmb.v14i1.68
  12. Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
  13. Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. In Guilford publications. Guilford publications.
  14. Hendrily, M., & Puspita, S. (2026). Analysis of the Relationship between Work Motivation, Transformational Leadership, Organizational Culture, Job Satisfaction on Employee Performance in the Millennial Generation Workforce. Amkop Management Accounting Review (AMAR), 6(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.37531/amar.v6i2.3799
  15. Indri, T., Desvrilla, K., Capriaty, C., & Puspita, S. (2026). The Influence of Work-Life Balance and Work Environment on Gen Z Employee Loyalty in Indonesia. Primanomics : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 24(1), 337–350. https://jurnal.ubd.ac.id/index.php/ds
  16. Mahesti, T., & Firmansyah. (2025). Efektivitas Sistem Kerja Hybrid Dalam Meningkatkan Work-Life Balance Dan Produktivitas Karyawan Pada Perusahaan Startup. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Akuntansi (JAME), 1(3), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.69666/jame.v1i3.16
  17. Ragazza, O. N. B., Djudiyah, & Nurhamida, Y. (2026). Job Stress as a Mediating Variable: Can Work-Life Balance Improve the Performance of Generation Z Employees in IT Consulting Companies? Psikostudia Jurnal Psikologi, 15(12), 287–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/psikostudia.v15i1
  18. Sahara, N., & Abdurohim. (2025). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Fleksibel Terhadap Motivasi Kerja Karyawan Gen Z Di Perusahaan Start-Up. Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi, 2(7), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i7.636
  19. Suryawijaya, T., & Putri, A. A. (2025). Tantangan Generasi Sandwich: Kelelahan Digital dan Produktivitas dalam Kerja Virtual. Jurnal Pemuda Indonesia, 2(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.65125/br0hht21
  20. Walz, T., Kensbock, J. M., de Jong, S. B., & Kunze, F. (2024). Lonely@Work@Home? The impact of work/home demands and support on workplace loneliness during remote work. European Management Journal, 42(5), 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2023.05.001
  21. Wheatley, D., Hardill, I., & Buglass, S. (2021). Handbook of Research on Remote Work and Worker Well-Being in the Post-COVID-19 Era. In IGI Global (p. 420). https://books.google.co.id/books?id=0e4lEAAAQBAJ

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.