Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to develop and validate a conceptual framework for a sustainability-based (ESG) bright cloud accounting model to address information gaps and improve access to financing for manufacturing MSMEs in Kendari City. The research method used is Research and Development (R&D) following the Borg & Gall model, involving problem identification, needs validation, model design, and expert validation. Data were collected through surveys and in-depth interviews with 30 MSMEs and 30 experts (academics, practitioners, and bankers). The research successfully designed a model framework consisting of four integrated components: an automated financial recording system, quantified ESG indicators, financial and ESG analysis engines, and comprehensive reporting outputs. Expert validation indicated a very high feasibility of the model, with average scores of 4.4 for the framework and 4.6 for the indicators, as well as the highest relevance (score 4.7) for the needs of green financing assessment by banks. The key conclusion is that this model has the potential to be an effective solution for reducing information asymmetry, documenting sustainability practices, and serving as a credible signaling tool for MSMEs in accessing financing, in line with sustainable finance regulations in Indonesia.

Keywords

Smart cloud accounting Sustainability-based accounting

Article Details

How to Cite
Sahlan, F., Hidayat, M. F., & Pracita, S. (2025). Sustainability-Based Smart Cloud Accounting Model for MSME Financing Access in Kendari City. Amkop Management Accounting Review (AMAR), 5(2), 1568–1579. https://doi.org/10.37531/amar.v5i2.3371

References

  1. Alsulami, F. (2025). Digital innovation and sustainable accounting practices: A systematic literature review through the governance context. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 14(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv14i1art4
  2. Amir, H., Dadang, S., & Agus, Z.A. (2023). Factors Affecting Cloud Accounting Adoption In SMEs. Jurnal Akuntansi, 27(3), 442–464. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v27i3.1520
  3. Baker, J. (2011). The Technology Organization Environment Framework. Information System Theory, 1(28), 231–245. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226145805_The_Technology-Organization-Environment_Framework
  4. Binaluyo, J.P. (2024). Exploring the challenges and opportunities for sustainability reporting adoption among small and medium enterprises: A case in a developing country in Asia. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(13), 8736. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd8736
  5. Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (1984). Educational Research: An Introduction. British Journal of Educational Studies, 32(3), 274–274. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232559864_Educational_Research_An_Introduction
  6. Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. (2019). Research Methods For Business (8th ed). Hoboken: Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Research+Methods+For+Business%3A+A+Skill+Building+Approach%2C+8th+Edition-p-9781119561248
  7. Department of Surveillance DKSJKT. (2024). Taksonomi untuk Keuangan Berkelanjutan Indonesia. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Tersedia pada: https://ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/info-terkini/Documents/Pages/Taksonomi-untuk-Keuangan-Berkelanjutan-Indonesia/Buku%20Taksonomi%20untuk%20Keuangan%20Berkelanjutan%20Indonesia%20(TKBI).pdf
  8. Dlamini, B., & Schutte, D. P. (2024). An Evaluation of the Adoption of Cloud Accounting by SMEs in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 15(1), 288–294. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.17076
  9. Fahmie, A., Pamungkas, B., & Munawar, A. (2025). Sustainable Accounting For SMEs in Indonesia: Implementation and Development Strategy. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v13i1.3099
  10. Hamzah Ritchi, Yahya, B., Roshi Dwiokta, & Sugianto, L. P. M. (2024). Driving Factors of Cloud Accounting Implementation in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): Evidence from Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems, 6(2), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v6i2.6827
  11. Idham. (2023). Pelaku UMKM di Kota Kendari Terus Meningkat. Radio Republik Indonesia. Tersedia pada : https://www.rri.co.id/daerah/128259/umkm-di-kota-kendari-terus-meningkat.
  12. Jansen, M.C. & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360. https://www.sfu.ca/~wainwrig/Econ400/jensen-meckling.pdf
  13. Junaidi M. (2024). Umkm Hebat, Perekonomian Nasional Meningkat. Ditjen Perbendaharaan KEMENKEU RI. Tersedia pada: https://djpb.kemenkeu.go.id/kppn/curup/id/data-publikasi/artikel/2885-umkm-hebat,-perekonomian-nasional-meningkat.html.
  14. Kartikasary, M., Wicaksono, A., Laurens, & Juvenia. (2023). Cloud Accounting Application Program Analysis in Micro, Small, and Medium Businesses in Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 388, 03022. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338803022
  15. O’Reilly, S., Mac An Bhaird, C., Gorman, L., & Brennan, N. M. (2024). Accounting practitioners’ perspectives on small- and medium-sized enterprises’ environmental sustainability reporting. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 26(6), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-08-2023-0250
  16. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021). The Future of Finance: Roadmap keuangan Berkelanjutan tahap II (2021 - 2025). Jakarta Pusat: Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/publikasi/Documents/Pages/Roadmap-Keuangan-Berkelanjutan-Tahap-II-%282021-2025%29/Roadmap%20Keuangan%20Berkelanjutan%20Tahap%20II%20%282021-2025%29.pdf
  17. Paunov, C., Sandra, P.S., & OECD. (2021). What Future for Science, Technology, and Innovation after COVID-19? OECD Science, Technology and Industry. 197: 1–69. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/04/what-future-for-science-technology-and-innovation-after-covid-19_21e14c42/de9eb127-en.pdf
  18. Petcu, M. A., Sobolevschi-David, M.-I., & Curea, S. C. (2024). Integrating Digital Technologies in Sustainability Accounting and Reporting: Perceptions of Professional Cloud Computing Users. Electronics, 13(14), 2684. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142684
  19. Purnamasari P, Tamba VR, Rahayu P, Sari W. (2024). Peningkatan Akses Pembiayaan Untuk Usaha Mikro Kecil Dan Menengah. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen. 28(12):168–177. https://jurnalhost.com/index.php/jekma/article/view/2264
  20. Rawashdeh, A., & Rawashdeh, B. S. (2023). The effect of cloud accounting adoption on organizational performance in SMEs. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(1), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.9.005
  21. Sa’adah RN. (2020). Metode Penelitian R&D (Research & Development): Kajian Teoritis dan Aplikatif. Malang: Literasi Nusantara Abadi. https://bintangpusnas.perpusnas.go.id/konten/BK45229/metode-penelitian-randd-research-and-development-kajian-teoretis-dan-aplikatif
  22. Sourabh, S. (2024). The Role of Cloud Accounting Solutions in Small Business Finance. 5(5). https://ijrpr.com/uploads/V5ISSUE5/IJRPR28267.pdf
  23. Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://www.sfu.ca/~allen/Spence.pdf
  24. Suchman, M.C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273070350_Managing_Legitimacy_Strategic_and_Institutional_Approaches_Academy_of_Management_Review_20_571-611
  25. Suyadi CC, Lataniambo RT, Efendy S (2025). Kota Kendari Dalam Angka 2025. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Kendari. Tersedia pada: https://kendarikota.bps.go.id/id
  26. Wahyuni, W., Sumarni, S., Fadilah, N. F., & Nurhalizah, N. (2024). Integrating Sustainability into Accounting Practices: A Review of Social and Environmental Accounting. Advances in Applied Accounting Research, 2(3), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.60079/aaar.v2i3.350
  27. WWF I. (2024). Laporan Sustainable Banking Assessment (Susba) 2023: Kemampuan Perbankan Dalam Mengelola Risiko Perubahan Iklim Perlu Diperkuat. Tersedia pada: http://www.wwf.id/id/blog/sustainable-banking-assessment-2023.
  28. You, X., Can, C., Ke, P., & Yubin, L. (2025). ESG Disclosure Quality and Cost of Debt. Emerging Markets Review, 64(c). DOI: 10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101219 https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ememar/v64y2025ics1566014124001146.html

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.