Article Sidebar

Download
Download PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 148 Download : 113

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This exploration intends to determine the impact of character, work direction and representative arrangement to some extent and all the while on representative execution at the Madya Dua Medan Assessment Administration Office. The exploration was led at the Madya Dua Medan Duty Administration Office Jalan Sukamulia No.17 A, North Sumatra DJP Provincial Place of Business I Floor 3, A U R, Medan Maimun Locale, Medan City, North Sumatra Territory, postal code 20151, with a populace of 117 individuals and the examination test involving upwards of 54 individuals. Information assortment was completed through meetings, polls and documentation. Using version 24 of the IMB Statistics for Product and Service Solution (SPSS) computer program, multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the data. In view of the consequences of the examination, it was found that character meaningfully affected the presentation of the representatives of the Medan Two Halfway Duty Administration Office. This was upheld by the consequences of the t count < t-table examination (4.033 > 2.009) at n = 54 at an importance level of 95%. Work direction affects the presentation of the Medan Two Moderate Expense Administration Office representatives; this is upheld by the determined t < t-table examination (0.676 < 2.009) at n = 54 at an importance level of 95%. The worker situation significantly affects the presentation of the Medan Two Moderate Expense Administration Office representatives; this is upheld by the examination of t count > t-table (3.622 > 2.009) at n = 54 with an importance level of 95%. The F-count esteem > F table (37.908 > 2.79) expresses that together (various) there is a positive and critical impact of character, work direction and representative situation on the presentation of the Medan Dua Moderate Duty Administration Office representatives.

Keywords

Personality; Work Orientation; Employee Placement; Employee Performance

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Kaloko, L., Isma, F. M., Lubis, M. A., Sinamo, H., Yusrita, Y., & Sadly, E. (2024). The Influence Of Personality, Work Orientation, And Employee Placement On Employee Performance At The Two Medan Madya Tax Services Office. Economics and Digital Business Review, 5(2), 01–10. https://doi.org/10.37531/ecotal.v5i2.1097
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik.
  2. Dirwan, A. (2022). Kepribadian Integratif Para Pendidik Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Surya Pasca Scientia, 11(1).
  3. Gani, I. A., & Nurmiati, N. (2023). PERENCANAAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA (TEORI, KEBIJAKAN DAN PRAKTIK BERBASIS KOMPETENSI DI ERA DIGITALISASI).
  4. Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariete SPSS 25. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
  5. Hamid, M., Sufi, I., Konadi, W., & Akmal, Y. (2019). Analisis jalur dan aplikasi SPSS versi 25.
  6. Jufrizen, J., & Lubis, A. S. P. (2020). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Kepemimpinan Transaksional terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dengan Locus Of Control Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Maneggio: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Manajemen, 3(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.30596/maneggio.v3i1.4874
  7. Montolalu, R., Kawet, L., & Nelwan, O. (2016). Pengaruh kepribadian, orientasi kerja dan penempatan pegawai terhadap kinerja pegawai pada dinas kebudayaan dan pariwsata provinsi sulawesi utara. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 4(1).
  8. Mundakir, M., & Zainuri, M. (2018). Pengaruh Kompensasi dan Motivasi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil dengan Kepuasan Kerja sebagai Variabel Intervening. Business Management Analysis Journal (BMAJ), 1(1), 26–36.
  9. Nursam, N. (2017). Manajemen kinerja. Kelola: Journal of Islamic Education Management, 2(2).
  10. Pasha, S. A. (2020). Kepribadian, Orientasi Kerja, Serta Penempatan Karyawan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Studi Pada Badan Kepegawaian Dan Diklat Pandeglang). Universitas Komputer Indonesia.
  11. Prayogi, M. S., Ambarita, R., & Hutagalung, H. (2023). Pengaruh Orientasi Kerja dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Dinas Perhubungan Kabupaten Tapanuli Tengah. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 6(3), 203–207.
  12. Prof. Dr. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. ALFABETA.
  13. Robyardi, E. (2020). Pengaruh Tingkat Pendidikan dan Pembagian Kerja Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Karyawan Pada PT Pos Indonesia (Persero) Palembang. Jurnal Media Wahana Ekonomika, 16(4), 289–295.
  14. Runtunuwu, H. J., Lapian, J., & Dotulong, L. (2015). Pengaruh disiplin, penempatan dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai pada badan pelayanan perizinan terpadu kota manado. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 3(3).
  15. Simbolon, M. (2007). Persepsi dan kepribadian. Jurnal Ekonomis, 1(1), 52–66.
  16. Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.
  17. Sya’baniah, S. I., Saryono, O., & Herlina, N. (2019). Pengaruh sikap dan kepribadian terhadap kinerja pegawai (Studi pada Dinas Sosial Kabupaten Ciamis). Business Management and Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(4), 162–177.