Main Article Content

Abstract

Digitalisasi telah mengubah fungsi manajemen keuangan dari aktivitas yang dominan bersifat administratif dan transaksional menuju fungsi yang semakin terintegrasi, analitis, dan strategis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mensintesis literatur mengenai digitalisasi manajemen keuangan serta implikasinya terhadap efisiensi, kualitas pengambilan keputusan, dan kinerja organisasi. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan mengadaptasi prinsip PRISMA 2020. Literatur ditelusuri melalui basis data akademik bereputasi dengan fokus pada artikel peer-reviewed yang relevan dengan digitalisasi fungsi keuangan, otomatisasi, sistem informasi akuntansi, business analytics, efisiensi, pengambilan keputusan, dan kinerja organisasi. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa digitalisasi manajemen keuangan berkontribusi terhadap peningkatan efisiensi proses, integrasi dan kualitas informasi, efisiensi alokasi sumber daya, serta kemampuan organisasi dalam menghasilkan keputusan yang lebih cepat dan berbasis data. Digitalisasi juga berimplikasi pada peningkatan fleksibilitas, inovasi, kualitas pengukuran kinerja, dan keberlanjutan organisasi. Namun, manfaat tersebut tidak bersifat otomatis karena dipengaruhi oleh keselarasan strategi, integrasi sistem, kompetensi digital sumber daya manusia, kualitas data, tata kelola, dan kapasitas organisasi. Kajian ini menegaskan bahwa digitalisasi sebaiknya dipahami sebagai kapabilitas organisasi yang menciptakan nilai melalui peningkatan efisiensi dan kualitas keputusan, bukan sekadar sebagai adopsi teknologi. Secara teoretis, penelitian ini mengintegrasikan berbagai temuan yang sebelumnya tersebar dalam satu perspektif penciptaan nilai organisasi, sedangkan secara praktis hasil kajian menekankan pentingnya transformasi fungsi keuangan yang terintegrasi antara teknologi, data, manusia, proses, strategi, dan tata kelola.

Keywords

digitalisasi manajemen keuangan; efisiensi; kualitas informasi; pengambilan keputusan; kinerja organisasi; systematic literature review

Article Details

References

  1. Abbas, K. (2026). Management accounting and artificial intelligence: A comprehensive literature review and recommendations for future research. The British Accounting Review, 58(2), Article 101551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101551
  2. Akter, S., Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2016). How to improve firm performance using big data analytics capability and business strategy alignment? International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.018
  3. Andreassen, R.-I. (2020). Digital technology and changing roles: A management accountant’s dream or nightmare? Journal of Management Control, 31(3), 209–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00303-2
  4. Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., Vasarhelyi, M., & Yan, Z. (2017). Impact of business analytics and enterprise systems on managerial accounting. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 25, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2017.03.003
  5. Bedford, D. S., Derichs, D., Hoozée, S., Malmi, T., Messner, M., Sinha, V. K., van der Kolk, B., & Verbeeten, F. (2025). Digitalization of the finance function: Automation, analytics, and finance function effectiveness. Management Accounting Research, 67, Article 100942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2025.100942
  6. Boerner, X., Wiener, M., & Guenther, T. W. (2025). Controllership effectiveness and digitalization: Shedding light on the importance of business analytics capabilities and the business partner role. Management Accounting Research, 66, Article 100904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2024.100904
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Chen, Z., & Jiang, K. (2024). Digitalization and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 91, Article 101915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101915
  9. Cosa, M., & Torelli, R. (2024). Digital transformation and flexible performance management: A systematic literature review of the evolution of performance measurement systems. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 25(3), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-024-00409-9
  10. Dirks, P., Möller, K., Schäffer, U., & Verbeeten, F. (2026). The impact of digital technology on management accounting and control. Journal of Management Control, 37, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-026-00416-0
  11. Fähndrich, J. (2023). A literature review on the impact of digitalisation on management control. Journal of Management Control, 34(1), 9–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-022-00349-4
  12. Huy, P. Q., & Phuc, V. K. (2025). Does effectiveness of digital accounting system intensify sustainable business model innovation with mediating role of digital business ecosystem? Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00444-x
  13. Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P., Kailer, N., & Weinmann, A. (2022). Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo. International Journal of Information Management, 63, Article 102466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466
  14. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  15. Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), Article 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
  16. Rikhardsson, P., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2018). Business intelligence & analytics in management accounting research: Status and future focus. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 29, 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2018.03.001
  17. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  18. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
  19. van Slooten, A. C. A., Dirks, P. M. G., & Firk, S. (2026). Digitalization and management accountants’ role conflict and ambiguity: A double-edged sword for the profession. The British Accounting Review, 58(2), Article 101460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101460
  20. Wang, S., Wen, W., Niu, Y., & Li, X. (2024). Digital transformation and corporate labor investment efficiency. Emerging Markets Review, 59, Article 101109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101109
  21. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
  22. Yoshikuni, A. C., Dwivedi, R., Dultra-de-Lima, R. G., Parisi, C., & Oyadomari, J. C. T. (2023). Role of emerging technologies in accounting information systems for achieving strategic flexibility through decision-making performance: An exploratory study based on North American and South American firms. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-022-00334-9