Article Sidebar

Download
PDF

Main Article Content

Abstract

Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Indonesia face a digitalization paradox: despite the rapid adoption of digital technologies, vulnerability to fraudulent activities increases alongside weak internal controls. This study investigates the integrative role of digital transformation and Management Accounting Practices (MAP) in fraud prevention among MSMEs in the Banyumas region, Central Java. Grounded in the Resource-Based View (RBV), the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) Framework, and Fraud Triangle Theory, the study constructs a mediation model in which MAP serves as a mediator between digital maturity and fraud mitigation effectiveness. Primary data were collected from 136 respondents comprising MSME owners and managers through purposive sampling using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) via SmartPLS 4.0. Results indicate that: (1) digital transformation positively and significantly influences MAP (β = 0.671); (2) MAP positively and significantly influences fraud prevention (β = 0.563); (3) digital transformation directly influences fraud prevention (β = 0.247); and (4) MAP mediates the relationship between digital transformation and fraud prevention with an indirect effect of 0.378. The overall model explains 63.9% of variance in fraud prevention (R² = 0.639). This study contributes theoretically and practically by demonstrating that digital transformation must be integrated with structured management accounting practices to create a secure and accountable financial ecosystem for MSMEs.

Keywords

Digital Transformation, Management Accounting Practices, Fraud Prevention, MSMEs, PLS-SEM, Banyumas.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Setianti, N., Pratapa, A., Lestari, P., Herwiyanti, E., & Susilowati, D. (2026). Integration of Digital Transformation, Management Accounting Practices, and Fraud Prevention in Micro, Small, and Medium-Sized Enterprises (MSMEs). Amkop Management Accounting Review (AMAR), 6(2), 503–511. https://doi.org/10.37531/amar.v6i2.3983
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2018). Fraud Examination (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  2. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3
  3. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2024). Occupational Fraud 2024: A Report to the Nations. ACFE. https://www.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2024/
  4. Bhimani, A., & Willcocks, L. (2014). Digitisation, ‘Big Data’ and the transformation of accounting information. Accounting and Business Research, 44(4), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2014.910051
  5. Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., & de Reuver, M. (2019). Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs? Telecommunications Policy, 43(9), 101828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101828
  6. Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7
  7. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2013). Internal Control—Integrated Framework. COSO.
  8. Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Free Press.
  9. Grande, E., Estébanez, R. P., & Colomina, C. M. (2011). The impact of accounting information systems on performance measures: Empirical evidence in Spanish SMEs. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 11, 25–43. https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v11_2
  10. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
  11. Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. (2015). Advanced Management Accounting (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
  12. Quattrone, P. (2016). Management accounting goes digital: Will the move make it wiser? Management Accounting Research, 31, 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.01.003
  13. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2024). SmartPLS 4 User Guide. SmartPLS GmbH. https://www.smartpls.com
  14. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Moisescu, O. I., & Radomir, L. (2020).
  15. Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM. Tourism Economics, 26(4), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618823921
  16. Scapens, R. W., & Jazayeri, M. (2003). ERP systems and management accounting change: Opportunities or impacts? European Accounting Review, 12(1), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818031000087907
  17. Saleh, N. M., Rahman, M. R. C. A., & Hassan, M. S. (2021). Digital transformation and internal control effectiveness in SMEs. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(4), 1121–1138. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2020-0186
  18. Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

Similar Articles

<< < 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.