Article Sidebar

Download
PDF

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to investigate the influence of Green Ambidextrous Leadership (GAL) on Green Employee Innovative Behavior (GEIB). It further explores the mediating roles of psychological safety and knowledge sharing, while examining Green IT Empowerment as a critical moderating variable.


Design – A quantitative approach was employed, utilizing a comprehensive model to analyze the interplay between leadership, psychology, knowledge management, and technology. Data were collected from employees in the petrochemical industry and analyzed to test the structural relationships within the proposed framework.


Findings – The results demonstrate that Green Ambidextrous Leadership is a pivotal factor in driving GEIB. This influence is primarily channeled through psychological safety and knowledge sharing, with psychological safety emerging as the more potent mediator. This highlights the necessity of a safe psychological climate for fostering environmental innovation. Furthermore, Green IT Empowerment significantly moderates these relationships, acting as a strategic enabler that amplifies the impact of organizational factors on green innovation. The integrated model explains 85.6% of the variance in GEIB, confirming the relevance of combining leadership, knowledge management, and technology empowerment perspectives in an industrial context.


Practical implications – Organizations should prioritize leadership development programs focused on green ambidextrous competencies and invest in Green IT infrastructure. Most importantly, management must cultivate psychological safety by transitioning from a “blame culture” to a “learning culture.” This can be achieved through no-retaliation policies for speak-up behavior and reward systems that recognize “intelligent failures” in green initiatives.

Keywords

Green Ambidextrous Leadership, Green Employee Innovative Behavior, Psychological Safety, Knowledge Sharing, Green IT Empowerment, Petrochemical Industry.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Khandiyas, M. E., & Kustyadji, G. (2026). Green Ambidextrous Leadership and Green Employee Innovative Behavior: : Mediating Effects of Knowledge Sharing and Psychological Safety and the Moderating Role of Green IT Empowerment. Amkop Management Accounting Review (AMAR), 6(1), 360–372. https://doi.org/10.37531/amar.v6i1.3548
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aburuman, N. M. (2016). The Impact of Administrative Empowerment on Creativity Improvement among the Workers of Jordanian Public Administration Institute 1- Study Problem : 7(1), 182–190.
  2. Ahmad, N., Samad, S., & Han, H. (2024). Journal of Innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(4), 100591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100591
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). ganizaAjzen, I. (1991The theory of planned behavior,Or). Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume 1, 438–459.
  4. Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
  5. Birkinshaw, J., Zimmermann, A., & Raisch, S. (2016). Bridging The Dynamic Capabilities and Ambidexterity Perspectives. CMR.Berkeley.Edu, 58(4), 36–58.
  6. Bock, A. G., Forces, S., Climate, O., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y., & Lee, J. (2005). sue in behavioral intention formation Knowledge Sharing : Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators , and Organizational. 29(1), 87–111.
  7. Carmeli, A., Reiter-palmon, R., Ziv, E., & Carmeli, A. (2010). Inclusive Leadership and Employee Involvement in Creative Tasks in the Workplace : The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety Inclusive Leadership and Employee Involvement in Creative Tasks in the Workplace : The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety. December 2014, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
  8. Choi, S. Y., Lee, H., & Yoo, Y. (2010). Qjarterly and Technology The Impact of Information Memory Systems on Knowledge Transactive and Team Performance : Sharing , Application ,. 34(4), 855–870.
  9. Edmondson, A. (2018). The Fearless Organization: Amy Edmondson. 41(3), 1–8.
  10. Edmondson, A., & Edmondson, A. (1999). Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
  11. Energy Solutions. (2023). Global Energy Perspective 2023: Executive Summary. McKinsey & Company.
  12. Ghozali, I., & Kusumadewi, K. A. (2023). Patrial Least Squares SmartPLS 4.0.
  13. Gong, Y., Cheung, S.-Y., Wang, M., & Huang, J.-C. (2012). Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380250
  14. Gupta, H., Kumar, A., & Wasan, P. (2021). Industry 4.0, cleaner production and circular economy: An integrative framework for evaluating ethical and sustainable business performance of manufacturing organizations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, 126253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126253
  15. Haider, S. A., Zubair, M., Tehseen, S., Iqbal, S., & Sohail, M. (2023). Bagaimana kepemimpinan ambidextrous mendorong inovasi di perusahaan konstruksi berbasis proyek ? Melalui peran mediasi berbagi pengetahuan dan peran moderasi inova. 1. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2021-0083
  16. Hansen, M. T. (1999). Knowledge Networks : Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies. 232–248.
  17. Hapsah, R., & Savira, S. I. (2015). HUBUNGAN ANTARA SELF EFFICACY DAN KREATIVITAS DENGAN MINAT BERWIRAUSAHA Sejalan dengan terintegrasinya perekonomian ditengah era globalisasi , maka setiap permasalahan ekonomi di dunia akan saling mempengaruhi dalam berbagai pihak . Dinamika perekonomian. 5(2), 81–90.
  18. Hossain, M. I., Teh, B. H., Tabash, M. I., Chong, L., & San, T. (2024). Fleksibel , dan Perilaku Inovasi Hijau terhadap Kinerja Inovasi Hijau di.
  19. Iqbal, Z., Ghazanfar, F., Hameed, F., & Mujtaba, G. (2020). Ambidextrous leadership and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior : Mediating role of psychological safety. June. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2279
  20. Jabeen, I., Zahur, D. H., & Jalalzai, N. N. (2023). Impact of Ambidextrous Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior : Mediating Role of Individual Ambidexterity. 4(1).
  21. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands , perceptions of e V ort – reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. 287–302.
  22. Janssen, O. (2005). Copyright © The British Psychological Society The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behaviour Copyright © The British Psychological Society. 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X25823
  23. JAVED, B., NAQVI, S. M. M. R., ABDUL KARIM KHAN, ARJOON, S., & HABIB, H. T. (2017). Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The role of psychological safety. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.3
  24. Lambrinou, E., Hansen, T. B., & Beulens, J. W. J. (2019). Lifestyle factors , self-management and patient empowerment in diabetes care. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487319885455
  25. Lu, H., Xu, S., Zhang, C., Pi, H., Chen, S., & Wu, C. (2025). mechanisms.
  26. Mariani, M., & Imam, K. (2012). A Preliminary Study of Green IT Readiness in Indonesian Organizations. 2(5), 1–10.
  27. Molla, A. (2009). The reach and richness of green IT: A principal component analysis. ACIS 2009 Proceedings - 20th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 754–764.
  28. Muafi, M. (2015). Green IT Empowerment , Social Capital , Creativity and Innovation : A Case Study of Creative City , Bantul , Yogyakarta , Indonesia. 8(3), 719–737.
  29. Ng, T. W. H., & Lucianetti, L. (2016). Within-individual increases in innovative behavior and creative, persuasion, and change self-efficacy over time: A social-cognitive theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000029
  30. OECD. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Cross Country Analysis: Approaches to Support Alternatives Assessment and Substitution of Chemicals of Concern. Environment, Health and Safety, Environment Directorate, OECD., 77.
  31. Özarall, N. (2015). Linking empowering leader to creativity : the moderating role of psychological ( felt ) empowerment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.899
  32. Paramatia, S. R., Mob, D., & Huang, R. (2020). The role of financial deepening and green technology on carbon emissions : Evidence from major OECD economies. September. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101794
  33. Park, J., & Lee, J. (2013). Knowledge sharing in information systems development projects : Explicating the role of dependence and trust. JPMA. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.02.004
  34. Petrokimia Gresik on the Move: Towards a More Innovative & Sustainable Industry 2023 Laporan Keberlanjutan Sustainability Report. (2023). PT. Petrokimia Gresik. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aQuJfQ75p8brcg_x8_Q9_Ga1fr4sGmnm/view
  35. Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014
  36. Salim, E., Tahar, A., Anurogo, D. satriyo, Karnawati, D., Boer, R., Syahrial, E., Medrilzam, Hutajulu, J., & tatang soerawidjaja. (2024). Transisi Energi Baru & Terbarukan.
  37. Schein, E. H., & Bennis, W. G. (1965). 376. $8.90. 31–32.
  38. Scott, S. G., Bruce, R. A., Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR : A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE. 37(3), 580–607.
  39. Sejarah Perusahaan Petrokimia Gresik. (2024). PT. Petrokimia Gresik. https://petrokimia-gresik.com/page/sejarah-perusahaan/print
  40. Setyaningrum, R. P., Kholid, M. N., & Susilo, P. (2023). Sustainable SMEs Performance and Green Competitive Advantage : The Role of Green Creativity , Business Independence and Green IT Empowerment.
  41. Siswanti, Y., & Muafi, M. (2020). Empowering Leadership and Individual Creativity : The Mediation Role of Psychological Empowerment in Facing Covid-19 Pandemic. 7(11), 809–816. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.809
  42. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making : Biased Information Sampling During Discussion. 48(6), 1467–1478.
  43. Sugiyono. (2023). METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF, KUALITATIF, DAN R&D.
  44. Sulistio, J., & Sugarindra, M. (2022). International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning The Effect of Green IT Empowerment and Online Training on Technology Innovation Performance : The Moderating Role of Green Life Style. 17(5), 1499–1509.
  45. United Nations Environment Programme. (2023). Emissions Gap Report 2023. https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2023
  46. Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
  47. West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds : An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups. 51(3), 355–424.
  48. Widhiastuti, A. (2022). Business Ecosystem & Strategy The role of environmental commitment and green creativity on business performance mediated by circular economy implementation. 4(4), 96–107.
  49. William, A., & Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF PERSONAL ENGAGEMENT AND DISENGAGEMENT AT WORK. 692–724.
  50. Wiryawan, Y. A., & Raharja, E. (2024). Competence and Knowledge Sharing Behavior as Determinants of Innovative Work Behavior : A Study on Employeeso The Semarang City Education Office. 09(0), 6469–6477.
  51. Xu, Z., & Suntrayuth, S. (2022). Innovative work behavior in high-tech enterprises : Chain intermediary effect of psychological safety and knowledge sharing. October, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017121
  52. Zhang, S., & Tu, Y. (2018). Cross-Domain Effects of Ethical Leadership on Employee Family and Life Satisfaction: the Moderating Role of Family-Supportive Supervisor Behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(4), 1085–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3306-4
  53. Zhang, X., & Zhou, J. (2014). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Empowering leadership , uncertainty avoidance , trust , and employee creativity : Interaction effects and a mediating mechanism. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION, 124(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.02.002
  54. Zhu, J., Lv, H., & Feng, Y. (2022). The Effect of Psychological Safety on Innovation Behavior : A Meta-Analysis. 211(Icfied), 3082–3087.

Similar Articles

<< < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.