Main Article Content

Abstract

This study seeks to observe the conception and application of green accounting as interpreted and applied by executives at Labuang Baji Regional General Hospital in Makassar. The methodological approach adopted is Moustakas' transcendental phenomenology, with data collection facilitated through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document review. There were six key participants in this investigation, namely the director, head of the finance division, head of facilities, medical waste administrator, environment/CSR coordinator, and internal auditor. Data analysis was carried out through a series of stages, including epoché, phenomenological reduction, imaginative variation, and essential synthesis. The results of the study show three main findings: (1) green accounting is interpreted as an expression of the hospital's moral, professional, and social responsibility in maintaining environmental sustainability; (2) the implementation of green accounting is reflected in environmental cost recording activities, medical waste management, and energy efficiency efforts, although it has not been fully integrated into the formal reporting system; (3) the application of green accounting faces obstacles in the form of a lack of technical regulations, limited human resources, and the absence of a sustainability unit that is structurally responsible for environmental issues. This study contributes to the literature on environmental accounting in the health sector in Indonesia and recommends establishing a sustainability unit, strengthening employees' technical capacity, and developing environmental reporting guidelines for public hospitals.

Keywords

green accounting phenomenology hospitals environmental accounting sustainability

Article Details

How to Cite
Saputra, A. R. E., Alimuddin, A., & Said, D. (2025). The Meaning and Implementation of Green Accounting by Hospital Management: A Phenomenological Study at Labuang Baji Regional General Hospital, Makassar. Amkop Management Accounting Review (AMAR), 5(2), 1340–1350. https://doi.org/10.37531/amar.v5i2.3355

References

  1. Abdullah, W. (2015). Pengaruh Tekanan Stakeholders terhadap Penerapan Akuntansi Lingkungan. Assets: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 5(1), 105–114.
  2. Agyeman, E. O., Oduro, R., & Boateng, P. (2022). Environmental accounting practices in Healthcare institutions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 362, 132314.
  3. Baxter, J., & Chua, W. F. (2003). Alternative management accounting research—whence and whither. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 97–126.
  4. Bennett, M., & James, P. (1998). The Green Bottom Line: Environmental Accounting for Management. Greenleaf Publishing.
  5. Burhany, D. I. (2014). Pengaruh Implementasi Akuntansi Lingkungan terhadap Kinerja Lingkungan. Seminar Nasional Ekonomi dan Bisnis.
  6. Burritt, R. L., Hahn, T., & Schaltegger, S. (2002). Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental management accounting: Links between business actors and environmental management accounting tools. Australian Accounting Review, 12(2), 39 50.
  7. Chua, W. F. (1986). Radical developments in accounting thought. The Accounting Review, 61(4), 601–632.
  8. Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1996). Do Australian Companies Report Environmental News Objectively? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(2), 50–67.
  9. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone Publishing.
  10. Gorz, A. (2003). Ekologi dan Krisis Kapitalisme. Yogyakarta: Insist Press.
  11. Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62.
  12. Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
  13. Idris. (2012). Akuntansi Lingkungan sebagai Instrumen Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan. Journal of Economic, 2(2), 1–10.
  14. Jasch, C. (2003). The use of environmental management accounting (EMA) to identify environmental costs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(6), 667–676.
  15. Kamayanti, A. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Akuntansi: Pengantar Religiositas Keilmuan. Yayasan Rumah Peneleh.
  16. Kerap, A. S. (2006). Etika Lingkungan. Jakarta: Kompas.
  17. Lenzen, M., Malik, A., Li, M., Fry, J., Weisz, H., Pichler, P. P., ... & Hubacek, K. (2020). The environmental footprint of health care: A global assessment. The Lancet Planetary Health, 4(7), e271-e279.
  18. Lu, Y., & Taylor, M. E. (2018). Environmental reporting in the public health sector. Public Money & Management, 38(5), 341–350.
  19. McGain, F., & Naylor, C. (2014). Environmental sustainability in hospitals: A systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 19(4), 245–252.
  20. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage Publications.
  21. Nurkhin, A. (2009). Corporate governance dan profitabilitas: Pengaruhnya terhadap pengungkapan tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 1(1), 46 55.
  22. Pandey, P., Govind, M., Srivastava, V., Singh, D., & Tiwari, P. (2016). Hospital waste management: An overview. International Journal of Science and Research, 5(8), 459–464.
  23. Riduwan, & Andayani. (2011). Tanggung Jawab Lingkungan dan Peran Informasi Lingkungan dalam Keputusan Manajemen. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi (SNA) 9.
  24. Rustiarini, N. W. (2010). Pengaruh corporate governance pada hubungan corporate social responsibility dan nilai perusahaan. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII, 1 23.
  25. Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2018). Contemporary Environmental Accounting. Routledge.
  26. Smith, M., & Loonam, J. (2019). Sustainability in healthcare accounting. Journal of Health Management, 21(3), 340–356.
  27. Said, M. (2020). Environmental Legitimacy and Organizational Behavior. Journal of Environmental Management, 260, 110–121.
  28. Sulistiowati, E., & Diyanty, V. (2016). Pengaruh kualitas pengungkapan sustainability report terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan manajemen laba sebagai variabel moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 13(1), 1 22.
  29. Thiel, C. L., Eckelman, M., Guido, R., Huddleston, M., Landis, A. E., Sherman, J., ... & Bilec, M. M. (2015). Environmental impacts of surgical procedures: Life cycle assessment of hysterectomy in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(3), 1779-1786.
  30. Thomson, I., & Bebbington, J. (2013). Sustainable development, management, and accounting: Boundary crossing. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(2), 277–283.
  31. Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., & Mustikaningrum, D. (2020). Good corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance in Indonesia: A triple bottom line approach. Heliyon, 7(3), e06453.
  32. Tregidga, H. (2013). Biodiversity offsetting: Problematisation of an emerging governance regime. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(5), 806 832.
  33. Triyuwono, I. (2012). Akuntansi Syariah: Perspektif, Metodologi, dan Teori. Rajawali Pers.
  34. United Nations. (1993). Handbook of National Accounting: Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting (SEEA).
  35. United Nations. (1993). Handbook of National Accounting: Integrated Environmental and
  36. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.
  37. Economic Accounting. Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 61. UN.
  38. WHO. (2022). Healthcare Waste Management Factsheet. Geneva: WHO.
  39. World Health Organization. (2022). Healthcare Waste Management Factsheet. WHO Geneva.

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.