Article Sidebar

Download
PDF

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to systematically review the literature on decision-making in capital budgeting, focusing on influencing factors, evaluation methods, and challenges encountered in practice. The research method employs Systematic Literature Review (SLR) analysis with the assistance of Watase Uake, Publish or Perish, ScienceDirect, Emerald, MDPI, SSRN, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Sinta, resulting in 27 relevant articles published between 2015 and 2025 that align with the research topic. The findings reveal that capital budgeting decisions are influenced by internal factors such as managerial competence, corporate governance, and information quality, as well as external factors including economic uncertainty, regulation, technology, and sustainability pressures. Traditional methods such as NPV, IRR, and Payback Period remain dominant, while advanced approaches like Real Options, Fuzzy Logic, and sustainability-based frameworks are emerging. Key challenges include data limitations, market volatility, methodological complexity, and behavioral bias. The study provides practical insights for financial managers to improve investment evaluation by integrating influencing factors, methods, and challenges into a more adaptive decision-making framework.

Keywords

capital budgeting decision-making internal and external factors investment evaluation methods challenges

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Usman, A., Mediaty, M., Mudasir, A., Femmy, I., & Izzah, S. N. (2025). A Systematic Review of the Literature on Decision Making in Capital Budgeting. Amkop Management Accounting Review (AMAR), 5(2), 1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.37531/amar.v5i2.3237
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdul-Salam, Y., Ovando, P., & Roberts, D. (2022). Understanding the economic barriers to the adoption of agroforestry: A Real Options analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 302, 113955. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2021.113955
  2. Alderman, J., Forsyth, J., Griffy-Brown, C., & Walton, R. C. (2022). The benefits of hiring a STEM CEO: Decision making under innovation and real options. Technology in Society, 71
  3. Almasan, A., Circa, C., Dobroszek, J., & Zarzycka, E. (2019). The assessed usefulness of management accounting in Romania and Poland: A comparative contingency-based study. Engineering Economics, 30
  4. Andrés, P. de, Fuente, G. de, & San Martín, P. (2015). Capital budgeting practices in Spain. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 18 (1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BRQ.2014.08.002
  5. Batra, R., & Verma, S. (2017). Capital budgeting practices in Indian companies. IIMB Management Review, 29 (1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IIMB.2017.02.001
  6. Cho, E. Y. N. (2024). A qualitative investigation of financial decision-making and enabling factors among ethnic minority young adults in Hong Kong. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11 (1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41599-024-03605-1;SUBJMETA
  7. de Souza, P., & Lunkes, R. J. (2016). Capital budgeting practices by large Brazilian companies. Contaduría y Administración, 61 (3), 514–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CYA.2016.01.001
  8. Dhalmahapatra, K., Verma, A., & Maiti, J. (2022). An integrated TRIZ coupled safety function deployment and capital budgeting methodology for occupational safety improvement: A case of manufacturing industry. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 165
  9. Frost, G., & Rooney, J. (2021). Considerations of sustainability in capital budgeting decision-making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312
  10. Gandhi, P. A., & Thomas, S. (2022). Tembo Global Industries Limited – financing dilemma for the COVID-19 project. The CASE Journal, 18 (6), 898–912. https://doi.org/10.1108/TCJ-08-2021-0132
  11. Huikku, J., Karjalainen, J., & Seppälä, T. (2025). Strategic factors and the use of risk analysis techniques in strategic investment decisions. Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2025.2486753
  12. Hunjra, A. I., Arunachalam, M., Verhoeven, P., Colombage, S., & Bouri, E. (2024). The interplay of CSR, stakeholder interest management, capital budgeting, and firm performance. Journal of Behavioural and Experimental Finance, 43
  13. Kuroki, M. (2022). Impact of Depreciation Information on Capital Budgeting among Local Governments: A Survey Experiment. Australian Accounting Review, 32
  14. Martin, P. R. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and capital budgeting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 92
  15. Mirza, N. I., Malik, Q. A., & Mahmood, C. K. (2020). The Value of Board Diversity in the Relationship of Corporate Governance and Investment Decisions of Pakistani Firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6 (4), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC6040146
  16. Mohamed, A. G., Alashkar, F., Akindeinde, A. S., & Daoud, A. O. (2025). Building resilience: A holistic approach for revitalising existing infrastructure assets. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 110
  17. Morales Burgos, J. A., Kittler, M., & Walsh, M. (2020). Bounded rationality, capital budgeting decisions and small business. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 17
  18. Nugroho, Y. K., Zhu, L., & Heavey, C. (2022). Building an agent-based techno-economic assessment coupled with life cycle assessment of biomass to methanol supply chains. Applied Energy, 309
  19. Nunden, N., Abbana, S., Marimuthu, F., & Sentoo, N. (2022). An assessment of management skills on capital budgeting planning and practices: evidence from the small and medium enterprise sector. Cogent Business & Management, 9 (1
  20. Saługa, P. W., Zamasz, K., Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z., Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K., & Malec, M. (2021). Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate and Its Components for Onshore Wind Farms at the Feasibility Stage. Energies 2021, Vol. 14, Page 6840, 14 (20), 6840. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN14206840
  21. Santos, M., Richman, V., & Hu, A. (2021). Financial impact of high land prices on the viability of winery startup projects. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 34 (2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-06-2020-0026
  22. Siziba, S., & Hall, J. H. (2021). The evolution of the application of capital budgeting techniques in enterprises. Global Finance Journal, 47 , 100504. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GFJ.2019.100504
  23. Smit, H. (2025). Sustainability Real Options. California Management Review, 67
  24. Sureka, R., Kumar, S., Colombage, S., & Abedin, M. Z. (2022). Five decades of research on capital budgeting – A systematic review and future research agenda. Research in International Business and Finance, 60 , 101609. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIBAF.2021.101609
  25. Tsagkari, M., Kokossis, A., & Dubois, J. L. (2020). A method for quick capital cost estimation of biorefineries beyond the state of the art. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 14
  26. Usman, A., Mediaty, , Khafifah, A., Ramadhan, M. A., Gandhi, W. A., Randayo, P., Ekonomi, F., Universitas, B., & Makassar, H. (2022). The Role of Management Accounting in Decision Making as a Form of Good Governance. Amkop Management Accounting Review (AMAR), 2 (2
  27. Vakili, S. V., Ballini, F., Dalaklis, D., & Ölçer, A. I. (2022). A Conceptual Transdisciplinary Framework to Overcome Energy Efficiency Barriers in Ship Operation Cycles to Meet IMO’s Initial Green House Gas Strategy Goals: Case Study for an Iranian Shipping Company. Energies 2022, Vol. 15, Page 2098, 15 (6
  28. Vanini, U., & Rieg, R. (2021). Risk attitude, information selection, and information use in capital budgeting decisions. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 13 (3/4), 253. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMFA.2021.10044559

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.