Article Sidebar

Download
PDF

Main Article Content

Abstract

The assessment of equity value serves as a crucial indicator in the banking sector, which plays a strategic role in the national economy. Fluctuations in PBV among listed banks on the IDX during 2020–2024 reflect dynamic market perceptions of banking performance. This study investigates the influence of intellectual capital and dividend policy on equity valuation with corporate risk disclosure (CRD) as an intervening variable. A quantitative research design was employed using panel data regression analysis. The sample consists of 20 banking companies listed on IDX for 2020–2024 period, with data processed through EViews software. The findings reveal that intellectual capital exerts a positive effect on equity valuation. Dividend policy and CRD demonstrate no significant influence. Furthermore, CRD does not mediate the relationship between the independent variables and equity valuation. The study highlights that equity value in Indonesia’s banking industry is primarily shaped by effective management of intellectual capital, rather than by dividend policy or CRD.

Keywords

intellectual capital dividend policy corporate risk disclosure firm equity value banking

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Habsyi, M. A., Sutisna, & Sari, G. I. (2025). Intellectual Capital, Dividend Policy, Corporate Risk Disclosure And Firm Equity Valuation In Banking Companies Indonesia. Amkop Management Accounting Review (AMAR), 5(1), 951–966. https://doi.org/10.37531/amar.v5i1.3146
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adusei, E., Mensah, H., & Demah, E. (2022). Examining the performance outcome of intellectual capital: a parallel mediation analysis. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 13(4), 568–581. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ajems-11-2021-0508
  2. Ahmad, F. (2023). Modified vaic model: measuring missing components information and treatment of exogenous factors. Managerial Finance, 49(9), 1453–1473. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-08-2022-0390
  3. Akbar, S., Khan, S., Haq, Z., & Amin, M. (2023). Dividend policy and shareholders’ wealth. a comparative analysis of shariah-compliant and noncompliant nonfinancial firms in pakistan. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jiabr-01-2023-0007
  4. Akgün, A., & Türkoğlu, S. (2023). Intellectual capital and performance of listed firms during the global financial crisis: the effects of legal origin. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32(4), 759–785. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-01-2023-3587
  5. Akhmadi, A., & Januarsi, Y. (2021). Profitability and firm value: does dividend policy matter for indonesian sustainable and responsible investment (sri)-kehati listed firms? Economies, 9(4), 163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9040163
  6. Albitar, K., Al‐Shaer, H., & Elmarzouky, M. (2021). Do assurance and assurance providers enhance covid-related disclosures in csr reports? an examination in the uk context. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 29(3), 410–428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-01-2021-0020
  7. Alshirah, M., & Alshira’h, A. (2023). The impact of corporate ownership structure on corporate risk disclosure: evidence from an emerging economy. Competitiveness Review an International Business Journal Incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, 34(2), 370–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/cr-01-2023-0007
  8. Alsultan, A., & Hussainey, K. (2023). The moderating effect of corporate liquidity on the relationship between financial reporting quality and dividend policy: evidence from saudi arabia. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-05-2023-0247
  9. Arora, N., Saggar, R., & Singh, B. (2021). Nexus between risk disclosure and corporate reputation: a longitudinal approach. Journal of Strategy and Management, 14(4), 529–544. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jsma-06-2020-0162
  10. Baker, H., Chang, M., & Ho, C. (2020). Value of dividend signaling in uncertain times. International Review of Finance, 21(4), 1419–1440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12334
  11. Battisti, E., Nirino, N., Christofi, M., & Vrontis, D. (2021). Intellectual capital and dividend policy: the effect of ceo characteristics. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(1), 127–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-11-2020-0354
  12. Bhattu-Babajee, R., & Seetanah, B. (2021). Value-added intellectual capital and financial performance: evidence from mauritian companies. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 12(3), 486–506. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-11-2020-0300
  13. Boonchukham, P., Pholkaew, C., & Dampitakse, K. (2023). Investigation of intellectual capital and firm performance in thailand: mediating role of earnings quality. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 13(11), 832–850. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55493/5002.v13i11.4868
  14. Boshnak, H. (2021). The impact of board composition and ownership structure on dividend payout policy: evidence from saudi arabia. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(9), 3178–3200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-05-2021-0791
  15. Budhathoki, P., & Khadka, K. (2024). The effects of dividend policy on the price of shares of microfinance companies in developing countries. Socioeconomic Challenges, 8(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.61093/sec.8(1).52-61.2024
  16. Dahiya, M., Singh, S., & Chaudhry, N. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and dividend policy in india. Management Decision, 61(10), 3144–3168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/md-08-2022-1152
  17. Dalwai, T., Mohammadi, S., & Šatrović, E. (2023). Intellectual capital efficiency, institutional ownership and cash holdings: a cross-country study. Review of Accounting and Finance, 23(1), 104–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/raf-01-2023-0015
  18. Dalwai, T., & Salehi, M. (2021). Business strategy, intellectual capital, firm performance, and bankruptcy risk: evidence from oman’s non-financial sector companies. Asian Review of Accounting, 29(3), 474–504. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ara-01-2021-0008
  19. El-Ansary, O., & Hamza, H. (2022). The underlying mechanisms of the relationships between corporate financial policies and firm value: flexibility and agency theory perspectives. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 15(3), 440–465. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/apjba-08-2021-0420
  20. Elmarzouky, M., Hussainey, K., Abdelfattah, T., & Karim, A. (2022). Corporate risk disclosure and key audit matters: the egocentric theory. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 30(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-10-2021-0213
  21. Elsayed, N., & Hassanein, A. (2023). Is voluntary risk disclosure informative? the role of uk firm-level governance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(6), 1826–1855. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-09-2022-0486
  22. Esqueda, O., & O’Connor, T. (2023). The cost of equity to earnings yield differential and dividend policy. Managerial Finance, 50(2), 451–471. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-01-2023-0063
  23. Fadila, A., Nugraheni, S., & Utami, K. (2023). Correlation Among Dividend Policy and Market Value of Equity in Banking Industry: A Residual Income Approach. Nominal Barometer Riset Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 12(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.21831/nominal.v12i1.54284
  24. Farooq, M., & Ahmad, N. (2023). Nexus between board characteristics, firm performance and intellectual capital: an emerging market evidence. Corporate Governance, 23(6), 1269–1297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-08-2022-0355
  25. Farooq, M., Aljabri, Q., Khan, M., Ansari, M., & Tariq, R. (2022). The impact of corporate governance and firm-specific characteristics on dividend policy: an emerging market case. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 16(3), 504–529. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/apjba-01-2022-0007
  26. Farooq, O., Satt, H., Bendriouch, F., & Lamiri, D. (2021). Dividend policy and the downside risk in stock prices: evidence from the mena region. The Journal of Risk Finance, 22(3/4), 261–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jrf-10-2020-0226
  27. Flammer, C., Toffel, M., & Viswanathan, K. (2021). Shareholder activism and firms’ voluntary disclosure of climate change risks. Strategic Management Journal, 42(10), 1850–1879. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3313
  28. Ghlichlee, B., Mohammadkhani, E., & Hatami, A. (2024). Knowledge-enhancing hr practices and sustainable competitive advantage: the mediating role of intellectual capital in knowledge-based firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 25(2/3), 275–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-05-2023-0120
  29. Gupta, K., & Raman, T. (2021). Influence of intellectual capital on performance. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals, 12(2), 53–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/ijhcitp.2021040104
  30. Habib, A., & Mourad, N. (2023). Analyzing the efficiency of intellectual capital: a new approach based on dea-mpi technology. Benchmarking an International Journal, 31(10), 3860–3883. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-06-2022-0384
  31. Hasan, M., Wahid, A., Amin, M., & Hossain, M. (2021). Dynamics between ownership structure and dividend policy: evidence from bangladesh. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-06-2020-0711
  32. Hermanto, Y., Lusy, L., & Widyastuti, M. (2021). How financial performance and state-owned enterprise (soe) values are affected by good corporate governance and intellectual capital perspectives. Economies, 9(4), 134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9040134
  33. Ibrahim, A., & Aboud, A. (2023). Corporate risk disclosure and firm value: uk evidence. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 29(4), 4225–4246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2871
  34. Indriastuti, M., Chariri, A., & Fuad, F. (2024). Enhancing firm value: the role of enterprise risk management, intellectual capital, and corporate social responsibility. Contaduría Y Administración, 70(1), 486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2025.5185
  35. Jain, S., & Raithatha, M. (2021). Risk disclosures and firm value: the role of governance in an emerging market. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(8), 3205–3227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-09-2020-0476
  36. Katona, K. (2021). Intangible assets as possible indicators for the growth of the hungarian firms. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 29(5), 764–775. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-03-2021-0060
  37. Khan, A., & Qureshi, M. (2023). Policy analysis to maximize the firm value: performing firm valuation using system dynamics. Journal of Modelling in Management, 18(5), 1291–1312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-10-2020-0272
  38. Krishna, V., & Jain, S. (2020). Modes of collaboration in open innovation practice of pharmaceutical firms in india: the analysis of survey and patent data. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(2), 222–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-04-2020-0113
  39. Kulshrestha, A., & Patro, A. (2021). Intellectual capital reporting and mandatory adoption of post-ifrs – an empirical analysis using computational linguistic tools. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(6), 1147–1179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-07-2020-0249
  40. Kumalasari, Y., & Aryani, Y. (2023). A decade of research on intellectual capital in Indonesia: Systematic literature review. Shirkah Journal of Economics and Business, 9(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.22515/shirkah.v9i1.643
  41. Kweh, Q., Ting, I., Lu, W., & Le, H. (2021). Nonlinearity in the relationship between intellectual capital and corporate performance: evidence from vietnamese listed companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(6), 1246–1275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-03-2020-0105
  42. Lehenchuk, S., Zakharov, D., Vyhivska, I., Makarovych, V., & Sheveria, Y. (2024). The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Company Financial Performance: Evidence From the Omani Industrial Sector. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 21(1), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(1).2024.26
  43. Li, Y., Li, J., & Zhai, Y. (2024). Intellectual capital and sustainability performance: the mediating role of digitalization. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 25(5/6), 867–890. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-06-2023-0129
  44. López-Zapata, E., & Ramírez-Gómez, A. (2021). Intellectual capital, organizational culture and ambidexterity in colombian firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 24(2), 375–398. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-08-2020-0286
  45. Mahmoud, M., Ismail, S., Dahmash, F. N., Ghaidan, E., & Ahmad, S. (2023). The Impact of Risk Disclosure on the Corporate Social Responsibility of Jordanian Banks. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202302.0352.v1
  46. Mazouz, K., Wu, Y., Ebrahim, R., & Sharma, A. (2022). Dividend policy, systematic liquidity risk, and the cost of equity capital. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 60(3), 839–876. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-022-01114-3
  47. Milanda, S., Halim, E. H., & Savitri, E. (2022). The Effect of Debt to Equity Ratio, Earning Per Share and Company Size on Market Value of Equity With Intellectual Capital as Moderating Variable. Indonesian Journal of Economics Social and Humanities, 4(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.31258/ijesh.4.1.41-54
  48. Mustafa, D., Alzebdieh, R., Abdullatif, M., & Majali, S. (2024). Intellectual capital and firm performance of jordanian financial institutions. Banks and Bank Systems, 19(3), 9–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.19(3).2024.02
  49. Nadia, L., & Hanafi, M. (2022). Do women board members affect dividend policy and cash holdings? evidence from asean emerging economies. Corporate Governance, 23(4), 705–722. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-01-2022-0011
  50. Nguyen‐Trong, N., & Nguyen, T. (2020). Firm performance: the moderation impact of debt and dividend policies on overinvestment. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 28(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jabes-12-2019-0128
  51. Nuhu, M., Ahmad, Z., & Zhee, L. (2024). Nexus among disclosure quality, discretionary accruals and real earnings management practices: an empirical analysis of malaysian public firms. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 35(4), 121–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22720
  52. Pham, H., Chung, R., Bao, B., & Min, B. (2020). Corporate payout policy: does product market competition matter? evidence from australia. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 17(2), 342–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmf-10-2019-0406
  53. Rahman, M., & Hongyi, L. (2023). Intellectual capital and firm performance: the moderating effect of auditor characteristics. Asian Review of Accounting, 31(4), 522–558. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ara-03-2022-0054
  54. Rahman, S., Taghizadeh, S., Khan, G., & Radomska, M. (2024). Intellectual capital and competitiveness improvement among micro-small-medium enterprises: a resource orchestration view. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 31(5), 829–851. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jsbed-08-2023-0387
  55. Raimo, N., Nicolò, G., Polcini, P., & Vitolla, F. (2022). Corporate governance and risk disclosure: evidence from integrated reporting adopters. Corporate Governance, 22(7), 1462–1490. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-07-2021-0260
  56. Rehman, W., Saltık, Ö., Değirmen, S., Ocak, M., & Shabbir, H. (2023). Dynamics of intellectual capital and financial performance in asean banks. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 42(4), 1426–1443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/agjsr-12-2022-0287
  57. Saha, R., & Kabra, K. (2021). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure: evidence from india. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 20(1), 127–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-03-2020-0079
  58. Sarah, D., & Probohudono, A. (2024). Maximizing asset management and intellectual capital: the role of enterprise resource planning in asean-5 construction firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 25(5/6), 984–1005. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-09-2023-0204
  59. Saravanan, R., Mohammad, F., & Dalal, S. (2023). The effect of ifrs convergence on risk disclosure: an investigation into the indian accounting system. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 31(5), 864–886. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-02-2023-0045
  60. Satt, H., & Iatridis, G. (2022). The effect of annual reports tone complexity on firms’ dividend policy: evidence from the united states. Review of Behavioral Finance, 15(4), 592–614. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/rbf-12-2021-0262
  61. Savitri, E., Abdullah, N., & Musfi, P. (2022). The performance of the financial sector during the covid-19 pandemic. Verslas Teorija Ir Praktika, 23(2), 377–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2022.16670
  62. Shubita, M. (2022). Intellectual capital components and industrial firm’s performance. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(1), 554–563. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(1).2022.44
  63. Singh, B., & Verma, P. (2023). How does intellectual capital drive firm performance via dynamic capabilities: evidence from india. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(7), 2136–2155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-10-2022-0555
  64. Smriti, N., & Das, N. (2021). Do female directors drive intellectual capital performance? evidence from indian listed firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(5), 1052–1080. https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-06-2020-0198
  65. Song, D., Zhang, P., Shi, R., & Yin, Y. (2023). Impact of strategic human resource management on open innovation: a chain mediation analysis of intellectual capital and supply chain integration. Chinese Management Studies, 18(4), 1085–1106. https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-01-2023-0023
  66. Suharman, H., Alipudin, A., & Hidayah, N. (2022). Corporate social responsibility, intellectual capital, and corporate performance in state-owned enterprises. QAS, 23(189). https://doi.org/10.47750/qas/23.189.04
  67. Tayachi, T., Hunjra, A., Jones, K., Mehmood, R., & Al-Faryan, M. (2021). How does ownership structure affect the financing and dividend decisions of firm? Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 21(3), 729–746. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-09-2021-0291
  68. Tiwari, R. (2021). Nexus between intellectual capital and profitability with interaction effects: panel data evidence from the indian healthcare industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(3), 588–616. https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-05-2020-0137
  69. Tran, N., & Vo, D. (2020). Do banks accumulate a higher level of intellectual capital? evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(2), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-03-2020-0097
  70. Trivedi, K., & Srivastava, K. (2023). The impact of intellectual capital-enhancing hr practices and culture on innovativeness—mediating role of knowledge management processes. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance, 11(3), 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-05-2023-0174
  71. Truong, B., Nguyen, P., Vrontis, D., & Inuwa, I. (2024). Exploring the interplay of intellectual capital, environmental compliance, innovation and social media usage in enhancing business performance in vietnamese manufacturers. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 25(2/3), 488–509. https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-10-2023-0233
  72. Ullah, S., Mehmood, T., & Ahmad, T. (2022). Green intellectual capital and green hrm enabling organizations go green: mediating role of green innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 15(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijis-12-2021-0222
  73. Vaghfi, S., Kamranrad, S., & Keshvari, F. (2024). The impact of innovation and differentiation strategy on financial performance with emphasis on the role of risk management and intellectual capital. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/jiabr-04-2023-0131
  74. Vo, D., & Tran, N. (2021). Intellectual capital and bank performance in vietnam. Managerial Finance, 47(8), 1094–1106. https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-03-2020-0143
  75. Wirama, D., Krisnadewi, K., Artini, L., & Ardiana, P. (2024). Dividend policy and residual dividend theory: evidence from indonesia. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 9(3), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajar-10-2023-0347
  76. Wufron, W., Parwati, N. S. S., Hamdani, N. A., & Utami, W. S. (2023). Dividend Policy: Analyzed From Stock Prices and Firm Size in Indonesia’s Manufacturing Sector. Kne Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i12.13701
  77. Xu, J., & Jing-suo, L. (2020). The interrelationship between intellectual capital and firm performance: evidence from china’s manufacturing sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(2), 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-08-2019-0189
  78. Zumente, I., & Bistrova, J. (2021). Esg importance for long-term shareholder value creation: literature vs. practice. Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, 7(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020127

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.