Article Sidebar

Download
Pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Accounting conservatism is a principle of prudence in financial reporting, where companies recognize potential losses and liabilities promptly while delaying the recognition of assets and earnings. This study aims to examine the influence of capital intensity, debt covenants, financial distress, and earning pressure on the application of accounting conservatism. The research focuses on non-financial companies listed in the LQ45 index during the 2021–2023 period. Using purposive sampling, 25 companies were selected, resulting in 75 observation units. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression with IBM SPSS version 25. The findings reveal that capital intensity and debt covenants have no significant effect on accounting conservatism. However, financial distress has a negative effect, while earning pressure has a positive effect on the application of accounting conservatism. These results highlight the role of internal financial conditions in shaping conservative accounting practices, offering insights for managers, investors, and regulators regarding risk assessment and financial reporting strategies.

Keywords

Accounting Conservatism; Capital Intensity, Debt Covenant, Financial Distress, Earning Pressure.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Thio Anastasia Petronila, Natanael Delfiero, & Juliana, C. (2025). Capital Intensity, Covenants, Distress, and Pressure: Drivers of Accounting Conservatism. Amkop Management Accounting Review (AMAR), 5(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.37531/amar.v5i2.2581
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Altman, E. I., Hotchkiss, E., & Wang, W. (2019). Corporate Financial Distress, Restructuring, and Bankruptcy (4th ed.). Wiley.
  2. Ariska, S., Puspa, D. F., & Puttri, D. (2018). Pengaruh Intensitas Modal, Dividend Payout Ratio Dan Financial Distress Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi Pada Seluruh Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2013-2017. Abstract of Undergraduate Research, Faculty of Economics, Bung Hatta University, 13(1). https://ejurnal.bunghatta.ac.id/index.php/JFEK/article/view/12805
  3. Azizah, Y. N., Wiharno, H., Martika, L. D., & Kuningan, U. (2022). Pengaruh Intensitas Modal, Debt Covenant Dan Growth Opportunity Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. 2(2). https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/jeam
  4. Biddle, G. C., Ma, M. L. Z., & Song, F. M. (2022). Accounting Conservatism and Bankruptcy Risk. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 37(2), 295–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X20934244/SUPPL_FILE/BMS_CONSERVATISM_AND_BANKRUPTCY_RISK_10MAY20_-_ADDENDUM_10MAY20.DOCX
  5. Fadhiilah, D., & Rahayuningsih, D. A. (2022). Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Penerapan Konservatisme Akuntansi. Akurasi : Jurnal Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.29303/AKURASI.V5I1.143
  6. Ghozali, I. (2020). 25 Grand theory : 25 teori besar ilmu manajemen, akuntansi dan bisnis (untuk landasan teori skripsi, tesis dan disertasi) / Imam Ghazali | Dinas Perpustakaan Dan Kearsipan Kota Yogyakarta (1st ed.). Yoga Pratama. https://opacperpustakaan.jogjakota.go.id/inlislite3/opac/detail-opac?id=49159
  7. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2022). SAK Efektif per 1 Januari 2022 (Revisi 2019). Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. https://web.iaiglobal.or.id/SAK-Umum-Efektif/SAK%20Efektif%20per%201%20Januari%202022#gsc.tab=0
  8. Jao, R., Ho, D., Studi Akuntansi, P., & Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Atma Jaya Makassar, F. (2019). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan dan Debt Covenant terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Jambi, 2(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5281/JRAJ.V2I1.426
  9. Kurniawan, Y. A., Farida, F., & Purwantini, A. H. (2022). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Intensitas Modal, Leverage, Growth Opportunities dan Financial Distress terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. Borobudur Accounting Review, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31603/BACR.6970
  10. Lasdi, L. (2009). Pengujian Determinan Konservatisma Akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33508/JAKO.V1I1.376
  11. Li, H. (2018). Unconditional Accounting Conservatism and Real Earnings Management. International Journal of Financial Research, 9(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5430/IJFR.V9N2P203
  12. Maharani, D. P., & Dura, J. (2023). Pengaruh Risiko Litigasi, Intensitas Modal Dan Financial Distress Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. Jurnal Ilmiah Bisnis Dan Ekonomi Asia, 17(2), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.32815/JIBEKA.V17I2.1697
  13. Nizar, M., & Kiswanto, K. (2022). Analysis Of The Influence Of Accounting Conservatism, Company Size, Capital Structure, Liquidity And Profit Growth On Earnings Quality. Kajian Akuntansi, 23(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.29313/KA.V23I1.7230
  14. Putri, W., Tartilla, N., & Pamungkas, M. N. (2020). Analysis of the Factors That Affect the Company"s Accounting Conservatism. The Accounting Journal of Binaniaga, 5(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.33062/AJB.V5I2.391
  15. Rafida, W., & Pratami, Y. (2023). PENGARUH FINANCIAL DISTRESS, INTENSITAS MODAL, LEVERAGE, DAN PROFITABILITAS TERHADAP KONSERVATISME AKUNTANSI. Journal Of Islamic Finance And Accounting Research, 2(1 FEBRUARI), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.25299/JAFAR.2023.12328
  16. Raharja, N., & Sandra, A. (2014). View article. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=tehyWEoAAAAJ&citation_for_view=tehyWEoAAAAJ:qjMakFHDy7sC
  17. Ross, S. A. ., Westerfield, Randolph., Jaffe, J. F. ., Jordan, B. D. ., & Shue, Kelly. (2022). Corporate finance (13th ed.). McGraw Hill LLC.
  18. Savitri;, E. (2016). Konservatisme Akuntansi Cara Pengukuran, Tinjauan Empiris dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya (1st ed., Vol. 1). PUSTAKA SAHILA YOGYAKARTA. //opaclib.inaba.ac.id%2Findex.php%3Fp%3Dshow_detail%26id%3D3567%26keywords%3D
  19. Sholikhah, Z., & Baroroh, N. (2021). The Roles of Capital Intensity in Moderating Managerial Ownership and Investment Opportunity Set (IOS) on Accounting Conservatism. Accounting Analysis Journal, 10(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.15294/AAJ.V10I1.40114
  20. Stice, J., Stice, E., & Skousen, F. (2010). Intermediate Accounting (17th ed.). South-Western. https://www.amazon.com/Skousens-seventeenth-Intermediate-Accounting-Hardcover/dp/B003NS50DS
  21. Sugiyarti, L., & Rina, S. (2020). Pengaruh Insentif Pajak, Financial distress, Earning Pressure Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. Jurnal Litbang Sukowati : Media Penelitian Dan Pengembangan, 1, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.32630/sukowati.v4i1.148
  22. Sulastri, A., Mulyati, S., & Icih, I. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Asean Corporate Governance Scorecard, Leverage, Size, Growth Opportunities, Dan Earnings Pressure Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Top Rank 50 ASEAN Corporate Governance Scorecard Di Indonesia yang terdaftar. ACCRUALS (Accounting Research Journal of Sutaatmadja), 2(1), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.35310/ACCRUALS.V2I1.6
  23. Suwarti, T., Wahyu W.L, Nurhayati, I. , & Zulfa A. S. (2020). Pengaruh Debt Covenant, Profitabilitas Dan Growth Opportunities Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi (Study Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di BEI Tahun 2016-2018). Proceeding SENDI_U, 627–632. https://r.search.yahoo.com/
  24. Tania, S., Pratiwi, L. N., & Laksana, B. (2021). Prediksi Kebangkrutan Menggunakan Metode Altman Z-Score Modifikasi pada PT Inti (Persero). Indonesian Journal of Economics and Management, 1(3), 628–633. https://doi.org/10.35313/IJEM.V1I3.3077
  25. Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1986). Positive accounting theory. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=928677
  26. Zahro, N. (2021). Growth Opportunity, Capital Intensity, and Accounting Conservatism: The Moderating Role of Managerial Ownership. KnE Social Sciences, 71–77–71–77. https://doi.org/10.18502/KSS.V5I7.9321